The Contribution of the Caribbean Court of Justice to the Development of Human and Fundamental Rights

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

The Contribution of the Caribbean Court of Justice to the Development of Human and Fundamental Rights. / Caserta, Salvatore.

I: Human Rights Law Review, Bind 18, Nr. 1, 2018, s. 170-184.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Caserta, S 2018, 'The Contribution of the Caribbean Court of Justice to the Development of Human and Fundamental Rights', Human Rights Law Review, bind 18, nr. 1, s. 170-184. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngx039

APA

Caserta, S. (2018). The Contribution of the Caribbean Court of Justice to the Development of Human and Fundamental Rights. Human Rights Law Review, 18(1), 170-184. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngx039

Vancouver

Caserta S. The Contribution of the Caribbean Court of Justice to the Development of Human and Fundamental Rights. Human Rights Law Review. 2018;18(1):170-184. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngx039

Author

Caserta, Salvatore. / The Contribution of the Caribbean Court of Justice to the Development of Human and Fundamental Rights. I: Human Rights Law Review. 2018 ; Bind 18, Nr. 1. s. 170-184.

Bibtex

@article{720c9345f3d547c99b7b53d1ccf7d0ea,
title = "The Contribution of the Caribbean Court of Justice to the Development of Human and Fundamental Rights",
abstract = "This article highlights some of the most important legal developments of the CCJ with the goal of clarifying its role as a human and fundamental rights Court. The article also assesses these legal developments in the light of the Court{\textquoteright}s authority. I argue that, through its case-law, the CCJ has succeeded in formally becoming a central player in the enforcement of human and fundamental rights in the region. In particular, the Court has shown a remarkable capacity to navigate the various different jurisdictions of the Caribbean States (ie, common v civil law systems) as well as the different legal cultures and approaches to international human rights and laws (ie, dualism v monism as well as British v international approaches to human rights). ",
author = "Salvatore Caserta",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1093/hrlr/ngx039",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "170--184",
journal = "Human Rights Law Review",
issn = "1461-7781",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Contribution of the Caribbean Court of Justice to the Development of Human and Fundamental Rights

AU - Caserta, Salvatore

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - This article highlights some of the most important legal developments of the CCJ with the goal of clarifying its role as a human and fundamental rights Court. The article also assesses these legal developments in the light of the Court’s authority. I argue that, through its case-law, the CCJ has succeeded in formally becoming a central player in the enforcement of human and fundamental rights in the region. In particular, the Court has shown a remarkable capacity to navigate the various different jurisdictions of the Caribbean States (ie, common v civil law systems) as well as the different legal cultures and approaches to international human rights and laws (ie, dualism v monism as well as British v international approaches to human rights).

AB - This article highlights some of the most important legal developments of the CCJ with the goal of clarifying its role as a human and fundamental rights Court. The article also assesses these legal developments in the light of the Court’s authority. I argue that, through its case-law, the CCJ has succeeded in formally becoming a central player in the enforcement of human and fundamental rights in the region. In particular, the Court has shown a remarkable capacity to navigate the various different jurisdictions of the Caribbean States (ie, common v civil law systems) as well as the different legal cultures and approaches to international human rights and laws (ie, dualism v monism as well as British v international approaches to human rights).

UR - https://academic.oup.com/hrlr/article/18/1/170/4818267

U2 - 10.1093/hrlr/ngx039

DO - 10.1093/hrlr/ngx039

M3 - Journal article

VL - 18

SP - 170

EP - 184

JO - Human Rights Law Review

JF - Human Rights Law Review

SN - 1461-7781

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 173429352