Meanwhile On the Other Side of The Pond: Why a biopharmaceutical invention that was "obvious to try", still might not be obvious - Part I
Research output: Contribution to journal › Review › Research › peer-review
Standard
Meanwhile On the Other Side of The Pond: Why a biopharmaceutical invention that was "obvious to try", still might not be obvious - Part I. / Minssen, Timo.
In: Chicago Kent Journal of Intellectual Property Law, Vol. 9, 2010, p. 60-131.Research output: Contribution to journal › Review › Research › peer-review
Harvard
Minssen, T 2010, 'Meanwhile On the Other Side of The Pond: Why a biopharmaceutical invention that was "obvious to try", still might not be obvious - Part I', Chicago Kent Journal of Intellectual Property Law, vol. 9, pp. 60-131.
APA
Minssen, T. (2010). Meanwhile On the Other Side of The Pond: Why a biopharmaceutical invention that was "obvious to try", still might not be obvious - Part I. Chicago Kent Journal of Intellectual Property Law, 9, 60-131.
Vancouver
Minssen T. Meanwhile On the Other Side of The Pond: Why a biopharmaceutical invention that was "obvious to try", still might not be obvious - Part I. Chicago Kent Journal of Intellectual Property Law. 2010;9:60-131.
Author
Bibtex
@article{c68e1f185e5a457abe247a0c23e12c93,
title = "Meanwhile On the Other Side of The Pond:: Why a biopharmaceutical invention that was {"}obvious to try{"}, still might not be obvious - Part I",
author = "Timo Minssen",
year = "2010",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "60--131",
journal = "Chicago Kent Journal of Intellectual Property Law",
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Meanwhile On the Other Side of The Pond:
T2 - Why a biopharmaceutical invention that was "obvious to try", still might not be obvious - Part I
AU - Minssen, Timo
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
M3 - Review
VL - 9
SP - 60
EP - 131
JO - Chicago Kent Journal of Intellectual Property Law
JF - Chicago Kent Journal of Intellectual Property Law
ER -
ID: 33955101