Let´s Dance! Excessive Royalties and the Economic Value of Music (C-372/19 SABAM)

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

Let´s Dance! Excessive Royalties and the Economic Value of Music (C-372/19 SABAM). / Kianzad, Behrang.

In: European Competition and Regulatory Law Review, Vol. 5, No. 2, 11.06.2021, p. 172-176.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Kianzad, B 2021, 'Let´s Dance! Excessive Royalties and the Economic Value of Music (C-372/19 SABAM)', European Competition and Regulatory Law Review, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 172-176. https://doi.org/10.21552/core/2021/2/15

APA

Kianzad, B. (2021). Let´s Dance! Excessive Royalties and the Economic Value of Music (C-372/19 SABAM). European Competition and Regulatory Law Review, 5(2), 172-176. https://doi.org/10.21552/core/2021/2/15

Vancouver

Kianzad B. Let´s Dance! Excessive Royalties and the Economic Value of Music (C-372/19 SABAM). European Competition and Regulatory Law Review. 2021 Jun 11;5(2):172-176. https://doi.org/10.21552/core/2021/2/15

Author

Kianzad, Behrang. / Let´s Dance! Excessive Royalties and the Economic Value of Music (C-372/19 SABAM). In: European Competition and Regulatory Law Review. 2021 ; Vol. 5, No. 2. pp. 172-176.

Bibtex

@article{46861697433248c9a48127e1d2d30af8,
title = "Let´s Dance! Excessive Royalties and the Economic Value of Music (C-372/19 SABAM)",
abstract = "Case C-372/19 Belgische Vereniging van Auteurs, Componisten en Uitgevers CVBA (SABAM) v Weareone.World BVBA and Wecandance NV, Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (Fifth Chamber) of 25 November 2020.The most recent excessive pricing case considered by Court of Justice of European Union (CJEU) revolved around fees imposed by a national royalty collective society (SABAM) on two Belgian festival organizers (Weareone.World BVBA and Wecandance NV). The Belgian national court submitted the case to CJEU for a preliminary ruling on whether the imposition of fees was to be considered an abuse of dominant position, and further, whether the fees levied were to be considered unfair and excessive in light of Article 102(a) Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.",
author = "Behrang Kianzad",
year = "2021",
month = jun,
day = "11",
doi = "10.21552/core/2021/2/15",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "172--176",
journal = "European Competition and Regulatory Law Review",
publisher = "Lexxion",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Let´s Dance! Excessive Royalties and the Economic Value of Music (C-372/19 SABAM)

AU - Kianzad, Behrang

PY - 2021/6/11

Y1 - 2021/6/11

N2 - Case C-372/19 Belgische Vereniging van Auteurs, Componisten en Uitgevers CVBA (SABAM) v Weareone.World BVBA and Wecandance NV, Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (Fifth Chamber) of 25 November 2020.The most recent excessive pricing case considered by Court of Justice of European Union (CJEU) revolved around fees imposed by a national royalty collective society (SABAM) on two Belgian festival organizers (Weareone.World BVBA and Wecandance NV). The Belgian national court submitted the case to CJEU for a preliminary ruling on whether the imposition of fees was to be considered an abuse of dominant position, and further, whether the fees levied were to be considered unfair and excessive in light of Article 102(a) Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

AB - Case C-372/19 Belgische Vereniging van Auteurs, Componisten en Uitgevers CVBA (SABAM) v Weareone.World BVBA and Wecandance NV, Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (Fifth Chamber) of 25 November 2020.The most recent excessive pricing case considered by Court of Justice of European Union (CJEU) revolved around fees imposed by a national royalty collective society (SABAM) on two Belgian festival organizers (Weareone.World BVBA and Wecandance NV). The Belgian national court submitted the case to CJEU for a preliminary ruling on whether the imposition of fees was to be considered an abuse of dominant position, and further, whether the fees levied were to be considered unfair and excessive in light of Article 102(a) Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

U2 - 10.21552/core/2021/2/15

DO - 10.21552/core/2021/2/15

M3 - Journal article

VL - 5

SP - 172

EP - 176

JO - European Competition and Regulatory Law Review

JF - European Competition and Regulatory Law Review

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 282002856