Law and orders: the orders of the European Court of Justice as a window in the judicial process and institutional transformations

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

Law and orders: the orders of the European Court of Justice as a window in the judicial process and institutional transformations. / URSKA, SADL; Zurita, Lucía López; Brekke, Stein Arne; Naurin, Daniel.

I: European Law Open, Bind 1, Nr. 3, 2022, s. 549-575.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

URSKA, SADL, Zurita, LL, Brekke, SA & Naurin, D 2022, 'Law and orders: the orders of the European Court of Justice as a window in the judicial process and institutional transformations', European Law Open, bind 1, nr. 3, s. 549-575. https://doi.org/10.1017/elo.2022.32

APA

URSKA, SADL., Zurita, L. L., Brekke, S. A., & Naurin, D. (2022). Law and orders: the orders of the European Court of Justice as a window in the judicial process and institutional transformations. European Law Open, 1(3), 549-575. https://doi.org/10.1017/elo.2022.32

Vancouver

URSKA SADL, Zurita LL, Brekke SA, Naurin D. Law and orders: the orders of the European Court of Justice as a window in the judicial process and institutional transformations. European Law Open. 2022;1(3):549-575. https://doi.org/10.1017/elo.2022.32

Author

URSKA, SADL ; Zurita, Lucía López ; Brekke, Stein Arne ; Naurin, Daniel. / Law and orders: the orders of the European Court of Justice as a window in the judicial process and institutional transformations. I: European Law Open. 2022 ; Bind 1, Nr. 3. s. 549-575.

Bibtex

@article{63d4dc5845e14f588f6c5372d7f52858,
title = "Law and orders: the orders of the European Court of Justice as a window in the judicial process and institutional transformations",
abstract = "Orders are judicial decisions designed to shore up fair and timely resolution of disputes. As written, detailed, and factual documents, they are reliable markers of procedural steps and a unique source of information about the inner working of an institution. This article examines all published orders of the European Court of Justice, drawing lessons from their use. The analysis demonstrates that the pursuit of efficiency and uniform application blurs the lines between the administration and judging. First, it centralises the institution, expanding the duties of the Registry and amplifying the role of the Cabinet of the President of the Court. Second, it bureaucratises the interpretation and the uniform application of European Union law. These processes are common in judicial institutions with no power over their dockets. But the particular European response, authored by the Court, also suggests its reluctance to forfeit the interpretive monopoly.",
author = "SADL URSKA and Zurita, {Luc{\'i}a L{\'o}pez} and Brekke, {Stein Arne} and Daniel Naurin",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1017/elo.2022.32",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "549--575",
journal = "European Law Open",
issn = "2752-6135",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Law and orders: the orders of the European Court of Justice as a window in the judicial process and institutional transformations

AU - URSKA, SADL

AU - Zurita, Lucía López

AU - Brekke, Stein Arne

AU - Naurin, Daniel

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Orders are judicial decisions designed to shore up fair and timely resolution of disputes. As written, detailed, and factual documents, they are reliable markers of procedural steps and a unique source of information about the inner working of an institution. This article examines all published orders of the European Court of Justice, drawing lessons from their use. The analysis demonstrates that the pursuit of efficiency and uniform application blurs the lines between the administration and judging. First, it centralises the institution, expanding the duties of the Registry and amplifying the role of the Cabinet of the President of the Court. Second, it bureaucratises the interpretation and the uniform application of European Union law. These processes are common in judicial institutions with no power over their dockets. But the particular European response, authored by the Court, also suggests its reluctance to forfeit the interpretive monopoly.

AB - Orders are judicial decisions designed to shore up fair and timely resolution of disputes. As written, detailed, and factual documents, they are reliable markers of procedural steps and a unique source of information about the inner working of an institution. This article examines all published orders of the European Court of Justice, drawing lessons from their use. The analysis demonstrates that the pursuit of efficiency and uniform application blurs the lines between the administration and judging. First, it centralises the institution, expanding the duties of the Registry and amplifying the role of the Cabinet of the President of the Court. Second, it bureaucratises the interpretation and the uniform application of European Union law. These processes are common in judicial institutions with no power over their dockets. But the particular European response, authored by the Court, also suggests its reluctance to forfeit the interpretive monopoly.

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/elo.2022.32

U2 - 10.1017/elo.2022.32

DO - 10.1017/elo.2022.32

M3 - Journal article

VL - 1

SP - 549

EP - 575

JO - European Law Open

JF - European Law Open

SN - 2752-6135

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 325389164