The US Supreme Court in Mayo v. Prometheus - Taking the fire from or to biotechnology and personalized medicine? Supreme Court of the United States, Mayo Collaborative Services, dba Mayo Medical Laboratories, et al., Petitioners v Prometheus Laboratories, Inc ., 132 S.Ct. 1289

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Review › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

The US Supreme Court in Mayo v. Prometheus - Taking the fire from or to biotechnology and personalized medicine? Supreme Court of the United States, Mayo Collaborative Services, dba Mayo Medical Laboratories, et al., Petitioners v Prometheus Laboratories, Inc ., 132 S.Ct. 1289. / Minssen, Timo; Nilsson, David.

I: Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property, Bind 2, Nr. 4, 2012, s. 376-388.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Review › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Minssen, T & Nilsson, D 2012, 'The US Supreme Court in Mayo v. Prometheus - Taking the fire from or to biotechnology and personalized medicine? Supreme Court of the United States, Mayo Collaborative Services, dba Mayo Medical Laboratories, et al., Petitioners v Prometheus Laboratories, Inc ., 132 S.Ct. 1289', Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property, bind 2, nr. 4, s. 376-388. https://doi.org/10.4337/qmjip.2012.04.05

APA

Minssen, T., & Nilsson, D. (2012). The US Supreme Court in Mayo v. Prometheus - Taking the fire from or to biotechnology and personalized medicine? Supreme Court of the United States, Mayo Collaborative Services, dba Mayo Medical Laboratories, et al., Petitioners v Prometheus Laboratories, Inc ., 132 S.Ct. 1289. Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property, 2(4), 376-388. https://doi.org/10.4337/qmjip.2012.04.05

Vancouver

Minssen T, Nilsson D. The US Supreme Court in Mayo v. Prometheus - Taking the fire from or to biotechnology and personalized medicine? Supreme Court of the United States, Mayo Collaborative Services, dba Mayo Medical Laboratories, et al., Petitioners v Prometheus Laboratories, Inc ., 132 S.Ct. 1289. Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property. 2012;2(4):376-388. https://doi.org/10.4337/qmjip.2012.04.05

Author

Minssen, Timo ; Nilsson, David. / The US Supreme Court in Mayo v. Prometheus - Taking the fire from or to biotechnology and personalized medicine? Supreme Court of the United States, Mayo Collaborative Services, dba Mayo Medical Laboratories, et al., Petitioners v Prometheus Laboratories, Inc ., 132 S.Ct. 1289. I: Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property. 2012 ; Bind 2, Nr. 4. s. 376-388.

Bibtex

@article{0929207ea1294112b1dfd6b944e1bafb,
title = "The US Supreme Court in Mayo v. Prometheus - Taking the fire from or to biotechnology and personalized medicine?: Supreme Court of the United States, Mayo Collaborative Services, dba Mayo Medical Laboratories, et al., Petitioners v Prometheus Laboratories, Inc ., 132 S.Ct. 1289",
abstract = "On 20 March 2012, the US Supreme Court handed down its much awaited patent eligibility- ruling in the dispute between Prometheus Laboratories Inc (“Prometheus”), acting as plaintiffs, and Mayo Medical Laboratories (“Mayo”), as alleged infringers of Prometheus{\textquoteright} licensed patents. This case review will first briefly describe the background to the case and the patents at issue (1), the procedural history (2), and the judgment of the Supreme Court (3). This is followed by a brief discussion of the decision{\textquoteright}s actual and potential implications for the patentability of biomedical methods and products including some comparative European views (4). The paper concludes with general remarks (5).",
author = "Timo Minssen and David Nilsson",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.4337/qmjip.2012.04.05",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "376--388",
journal = "Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property",
issn = "2045-9807",
publisher = "Edward Elgar Publishing",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The US Supreme Court in Mayo v. Prometheus - Taking the fire from or to biotechnology and personalized medicine?

T2 - Supreme Court of the United States, Mayo Collaborative Services, dba Mayo Medical Laboratories, et al., Petitioners v Prometheus Laboratories, Inc ., 132 S.Ct. 1289

AU - Minssen, Timo

AU - Nilsson, David

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - On 20 March 2012, the US Supreme Court handed down its much awaited patent eligibility- ruling in the dispute between Prometheus Laboratories Inc (“Prometheus”), acting as plaintiffs, and Mayo Medical Laboratories (“Mayo”), as alleged infringers of Prometheus’ licensed patents. This case review will first briefly describe the background to the case and the patents at issue (1), the procedural history (2), and the judgment of the Supreme Court (3). This is followed by a brief discussion of the decision’s actual and potential implications for the patentability of biomedical methods and products including some comparative European views (4). The paper concludes with general remarks (5).

AB - On 20 March 2012, the US Supreme Court handed down its much awaited patent eligibility- ruling in the dispute between Prometheus Laboratories Inc (“Prometheus”), acting as plaintiffs, and Mayo Medical Laboratories (“Mayo”), as alleged infringers of Prometheus’ licensed patents. This case review will first briefly describe the background to the case and the patents at issue (1), the procedural history (2), and the judgment of the Supreme Court (3). This is followed by a brief discussion of the decision’s actual and potential implications for the patentability of biomedical methods and products including some comparative European views (4). The paper concludes with general remarks (5).

U2 - 10.4337/qmjip.2012.04.05

DO - 10.4337/qmjip.2012.04.05

M3 - Review

VL - 2

SP - 376

EP - 388

JO - Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property

JF - Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property

SN - 2045-9807

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 38374908