The public-private governance regime on sustainable ship recycling: An in-depth analysis

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

The public-private governance regime on sustainable ship recycling : An in-depth analysis. / Glinski, Carola.

I: RECIEL - Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, Bind 31, Nr. 2, 2022, s. 268-281.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Glinski, C 2022, 'The public-private governance regime on sustainable ship recycling: An in-depth analysis', RECIEL - Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, bind 31, nr. 2, s. 268-281. https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12449

APA

Glinski, C. (2022). The public-private governance regime on sustainable ship recycling: An in-depth analysis. RECIEL - Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, 31(2), 268-281. https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12449

Vancouver

Glinski C. The public-private governance regime on sustainable ship recycling: An in-depth analysis. RECIEL - Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law. 2022;31(2):268-281. https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12449

Author

Glinski, Carola. / The public-private governance regime on sustainable ship recycling : An in-depth analysis. I: RECIEL - Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law. 2022 ; Bind 31, Nr. 2. s. 268-281.

Bibtex

@article{eb4aeb970d304519afa49d1ec73f1ada,
title = "The public-private governance regime on sustainable ship recycling: An in-depth analysis",
abstract = "To address global sustainability issues, legal frameworks increasingly build upon private governance contributions such as private standardization and/or private certification. This is particularly true for ship recycling under the Hong Kong Convention and its European implementation, the Ship Recycling Regulation. After a brief introduction into the old public law approach as compared with the new public–private governance structure, the article offers a critical in-depth analysis of the effectiveness of the new governance structure based upon private certification. It thereby draws from research in, and experience with, traditional ship classification as well as other certification systems in European Union law. The article concludes that, despite laudable elements, the governance structure of the Ship Recycling Regulation has some important gaps and does not remedy the classical conflicts of interest of certification organizations. Among others, it should be complemented with a liability regime.",
author = "Carola Glinski",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1111/reel.12449",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "268--281",
journal = "RECIEL - Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law",
issn = "2050-0386",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The public-private governance regime on sustainable ship recycling

T2 - An in-depth analysis

AU - Glinski, Carola

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - To address global sustainability issues, legal frameworks increasingly build upon private governance contributions such as private standardization and/or private certification. This is particularly true for ship recycling under the Hong Kong Convention and its European implementation, the Ship Recycling Regulation. After a brief introduction into the old public law approach as compared with the new public–private governance structure, the article offers a critical in-depth analysis of the effectiveness of the new governance structure based upon private certification. It thereby draws from research in, and experience with, traditional ship classification as well as other certification systems in European Union law. The article concludes that, despite laudable elements, the governance structure of the Ship Recycling Regulation has some important gaps and does not remedy the classical conflicts of interest of certification organizations. Among others, it should be complemented with a liability regime.

AB - To address global sustainability issues, legal frameworks increasingly build upon private governance contributions such as private standardization and/or private certification. This is particularly true for ship recycling under the Hong Kong Convention and its European implementation, the Ship Recycling Regulation. After a brief introduction into the old public law approach as compared with the new public–private governance structure, the article offers a critical in-depth analysis of the effectiveness of the new governance structure based upon private certification. It thereby draws from research in, and experience with, traditional ship classification as well as other certification systems in European Union law. The article concludes that, despite laudable elements, the governance structure of the Ship Recycling Regulation has some important gaps and does not remedy the classical conflicts of interest of certification organizations. Among others, it should be complemented with a liability regime.

U2 - 10.1111/reel.12449

DO - 10.1111/reel.12449

M3 - Journal article

VL - 31

SP - 268

EP - 281

JO - RECIEL - Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law

JF - RECIEL - Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law

SN - 2050-0386

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 284281991