The Limits of International Adjudication: Authority and Resistance of Regional Economic Courts in Times of Crisis

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

The Limits of International Adjudication: Authority and Resistance of Regional Economic Courts in Times of Crisis. / Caserta, Salvatore; Cebulak, Pola.

I: International Journal of Law in Context, Bind 14, Nr. 2, 2018, s. 275-293.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Caserta, S & Cebulak, P 2018, 'The Limits of International Adjudication: Authority and Resistance of Regional Economic Courts in Times of Crisis', International Journal of Law in Context, bind 14, nr. 2, s. 275-293. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552318000071

APA

Caserta, S., & Cebulak, P. (2018). The Limits of International Adjudication: Authority and Resistance of Regional Economic Courts in Times of Crisis. International Journal of Law in Context, 14(2), 275-293. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552318000071

Vancouver

Caserta S, Cebulak P. The Limits of International Adjudication: Authority and Resistance of Regional Economic Courts in Times of Crisis. International Journal of Law in Context. 2018;14(2):275-293. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744552318000071

Author

Caserta, Salvatore ; Cebulak, Pola. / The Limits of International Adjudication: Authority and Resistance of Regional Economic Courts in Times of Crisis. I: International Journal of Law in Context. 2018 ; Bind 14, Nr. 2. s. 275-293.

Bibtex

@article{2bb1f3d232ba44869ec09820c9e418fc,
title = "The Limits of International Adjudication: Authority and Resistance of Regional Economic Courts in Times of Crisis",
abstract = "The article compares the involvement of four regional economic courts in legal disputes mirroring constitutional, political and social crises at national or regional level. These four judicial bodies of the European Union, the Andean Community, the East African Community and the Central American Integration System have all faced varied forms of resistance to their involvement and their general authority. By comparing these four case studies from across the globe, the article identifies institutional and contextual factors that explain the uneven resistance. While the regional economic courts in Central America and East Africa were subject to backlash from the member states, their counterparts in Europe and Latin America avoided backlash but at the prize of achieving only a narrow authority. ",
author = "Salvatore Caserta and Pola Cebulak",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1017/S1744552318000071",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "275--293",
journal = "International Journal of Law in Context",
issn = "1744-5523",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Limits of International Adjudication: Authority and Resistance of Regional Economic Courts in Times of Crisis

AU - Caserta, Salvatore

AU - Cebulak, Pola

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - The article compares the involvement of four regional economic courts in legal disputes mirroring constitutional, political and social crises at national or regional level. These four judicial bodies of the European Union, the Andean Community, the East African Community and the Central American Integration System have all faced varied forms of resistance to their involvement and their general authority. By comparing these four case studies from across the globe, the article identifies institutional and contextual factors that explain the uneven resistance. While the regional economic courts in Central America and East Africa were subject to backlash from the member states, their counterparts in Europe and Latin America avoided backlash but at the prize of achieving only a narrow authority.

AB - The article compares the involvement of four regional economic courts in legal disputes mirroring constitutional, political and social crises at national or regional level. These four judicial bodies of the European Union, the Andean Community, the East African Community and the Central American Integration System have all faced varied forms of resistance to their involvement and their general authority. By comparing these four case studies from across the globe, the article identifies institutional and contextual factors that explain the uneven resistance. While the regional economic courts in Central America and East Africa were subject to backlash from the member states, their counterparts in Europe and Latin America avoided backlash but at the prize of achieving only a narrow authority.

U2 - 10.1017/S1744552318000071

DO - 10.1017/S1744552318000071

M3 - Journal article

VL - 14

SP - 275

EP - 293

JO - International Journal of Law in Context

JF - International Journal of Law in Context

SN - 1744-5523

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 192113630