If You Love Somebody Set Them Free: On the Court of Justice's Revision of the Acte Clair Doctrine

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

If You Love Somebody Set Them Free: On the Court of Justice's Revision of the Acte Clair Doctrine. / Broberg, Morten; Fenger, Niels.

I: Common Market Law Review, Bind 59, Nr. 3, 01.06.2022, s. 711-738.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Broberg, M & Fenger, N 2022, 'If You Love Somebody Set Them Free: On the Court of Justice's Revision of the Acte Clair Doctrine', Common Market Law Review, bind 59, nr. 3, s. 711-738. https://doi.org/10.54648/cola2022050

APA

Broberg, M., & Fenger, N. (2022). If You Love Somebody Set Them Free: On the Court of Justice's Revision of the Acte Clair Doctrine. Common Market Law Review, 59(3), 711-738. https://doi.org/10.54648/cola2022050

Vancouver

Broberg M, Fenger N. If You Love Somebody Set Them Free: On the Court of Justice's Revision of the Acte Clair Doctrine. Common Market Law Review. 2022 jun. 1;59(3):711-738. https://doi.org/10.54648/cola2022050

Author

Broberg, Morten ; Fenger, Niels. / If You Love Somebody Set Them Free: On the Court of Justice's Revision of the Acte Clair Doctrine. I: Common Market Law Review. 2022 ; Bind 59, Nr. 3. s. 711-738.

Bibtex

@article{ff12d847aea547d0ac62b04f3657abc8,
title = "If You Love Somebody Set Them Free: On the Court of Justice's Revision of the Acte Clair Doctrine",
abstract = "In its 2021 ruling in Consorzio, the European Court of Justice adopted a more pragmatic approach to its acte clair doctrine. This article analyses this reform and shows that in important respects the Court has eased the requirements for finding a question of EU law to be acte clair. Simultaneously, the Court has introduced a duty for national courts of last instance to give reasons where they are faced with questions of EU law and decide not to make a preliminary reference. The article also considers the Court{\textquoteright}s discreet change of approach regarding the application (rather than the interpretation) of EU law by national courts of last instance as reflected in the Consorzio ruling, and argues that there is acte clair where the abstract interpretation of EU law is clear and leaves no scope for any reasonable doubt, even if the national court of last instance entertains doubts as to the correct application of said EU law to the case at hand.",
author = "Morten Broberg and Niels Fenger",
year = "2022",
month = jun,
day = "1",
doi = "10.54648/cola2022050",
language = "English",
volume = "59",
pages = "711--738",
journal = "Common Market Law Review",
issn = "0165-0750",
publisher = "Kluwer Law International",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - If You Love Somebody Set Them Free: On the Court of Justice's Revision of the Acte Clair Doctrine

AU - Broberg, Morten

AU - Fenger, Niels

PY - 2022/6/1

Y1 - 2022/6/1

N2 - In its 2021 ruling in Consorzio, the European Court of Justice adopted a more pragmatic approach to its acte clair doctrine. This article analyses this reform and shows that in important respects the Court has eased the requirements for finding a question of EU law to be acte clair. Simultaneously, the Court has introduced a duty for national courts of last instance to give reasons where they are faced with questions of EU law and decide not to make a preliminary reference. The article also considers the Court’s discreet change of approach regarding the application (rather than the interpretation) of EU law by national courts of last instance as reflected in the Consorzio ruling, and argues that there is acte clair where the abstract interpretation of EU law is clear and leaves no scope for any reasonable doubt, even if the national court of last instance entertains doubts as to the correct application of said EU law to the case at hand.

AB - In its 2021 ruling in Consorzio, the European Court of Justice adopted a more pragmatic approach to its acte clair doctrine. This article analyses this reform and shows that in important respects the Court has eased the requirements for finding a question of EU law to be acte clair. Simultaneously, the Court has introduced a duty for national courts of last instance to give reasons where they are faced with questions of EU law and decide not to make a preliminary reference. The article also considers the Court’s discreet change of approach regarding the application (rather than the interpretation) of EU law by national courts of last instance as reflected in the Consorzio ruling, and argues that there is acte clair where the abstract interpretation of EU law is clear and leaves no scope for any reasonable doubt, even if the national court of last instance entertains doubts as to the correct application of said EU law to the case at hand.

U2 - 10.54648/cola2022050

DO - 10.54648/cola2022050

M3 - Journal article

VL - 59

SP - 711

EP - 738

JO - Common Market Law Review

JF - Common Market Law Review

SN - 0165-0750

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 300941402