"Biosimilar, so it looks alike, but what does it mean?" A qualitative study of Danish patients' perceptions of biosimilars

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

"Biosimilar, so it looks alike, but what does it mean?" A qualitative study of Danish patients' perceptions of biosimilars. / Varma, Meera; Almarsdóttir, Anna Birna; Druedahl, Louise C.

I: Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, Bind 130, Nr. 5, 2022, s. 581-591.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Varma, M, Almarsdóttir, AB & Druedahl, LC 2022, '"Biosimilar, so it looks alike, but what does it mean?" A qualitative study of Danish patients' perceptions of biosimilars', Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, bind 130, nr. 5, s. 581-591. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcpt.13719

APA

Varma, M., Almarsdóttir, A. B., & Druedahl, L. C. (2022). "Biosimilar, so it looks alike, but what does it mean?" A qualitative study of Danish patients' perceptions of biosimilars. Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, 130(5), 581-591. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcpt.13719

Vancouver

Varma M, Almarsdóttir AB, Druedahl LC. "Biosimilar, so it looks alike, but what does it mean?" A qualitative study of Danish patients' perceptions of biosimilars. Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology. 2022;130(5):581-591. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcpt.13719

Author

Varma, Meera ; Almarsdóttir, Anna Birna ; Druedahl, Louise C. / "Biosimilar, so it looks alike, but what does it mean?" A qualitative study of Danish patients' perceptions of biosimilars. I: Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology. 2022 ; Bind 130, Nr. 5. s. 581-591.

Bibtex

@article{c30b8ee493ba4979b4b5c884600899cf,
title = "{"}Biosimilar, so it looks alike, but what does it mean?{"} A qualitative study of Danish patients' perceptions of biosimilars",
abstract = "Biosimilars are highly similar follow-on products for biologics that can foster biologics competition. Questionnaire studies have attempted to gauge the patient perspective on biosimilars, but none have delved deeper into how patients view biologics and switching of these. Considering Denmark has one of the highest biosimilar uptake worldwide, the aim of this study was to investigate how Danish patients with psoriasis, arthritic diseases, or inflammatory bowel disease perceive biosimilars. Twelve participants were semi-structurally interviewed in either a focus group or an internet-based, individual interview between May 2019 and July 2019. Content analysis was inductively applied. Participants on originators voiced more reluctance towards using biosimilars than those already using them. Both participants using originator and biosimilar products expressed concerns about reoccurrence of disease symptoms due to differences in effectiveness and safety. Participants generally struggled with understanding biosimilarity, and they voiced a need to be well-informed about switching. They were all aware of and accepted how healthcare budget restrictions played a role in the push to use biosimilars. To improve biosimilar uptake and willingness to switch to a biosimilar, patient-centred information on efficacy and safety and explanation of the societal benefits of the savings from using biosimilars must be carefully communicated.",
author = "Meera Varma and Almarsd{\'o}ttir, {Anna Birna} and Druedahl, {Louise C}",
note = "This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1111/bcpt.13719",
language = "English",
volume = "130",
pages = "581--591",
journal = "Basic and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology",
issn = "1742-7835",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - "Biosimilar, so it looks alike, but what does it mean?" A qualitative study of Danish patients' perceptions of biosimilars

AU - Varma, Meera

AU - Almarsdóttir, Anna Birna

AU - Druedahl, Louise C

N1 - This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Biosimilars are highly similar follow-on products for biologics that can foster biologics competition. Questionnaire studies have attempted to gauge the patient perspective on biosimilars, but none have delved deeper into how patients view biologics and switching of these. Considering Denmark has one of the highest biosimilar uptake worldwide, the aim of this study was to investigate how Danish patients with psoriasis, arthritic diseases, or inflammatory bowel disease perceive biosimilars. Twelve participants were semi-structurally interviewed in either a focus group or an internet-based, individual interview between May 2019 and July 2019. Content analysis was inductively applied. Participants on originators voiced more reluctance towards using biosimilars than those already using them. Both participants using originator and biosimilar products expressed concerns about reoccurrence of disease symptoms due to differences in effectiveness and safety. Participants generally struggled with understanding biosimilarity, and they voiced a need to be well-informed about switching. They were all aware of and accepted how healthcare budget restrictions played a role in the push to use biosimilars. To improve biosimilar uptake and willingness to switch to a biosimilar, patient-centred information on efficacy and safety and explanation of the societal benefits of the savings from using biosimilars must be carefully communicated.

AB - Biosimilars are highly similar follow-on products for biologics that can foster biologics competition. Questionnaire studies have attempted to gauge the patient perspective on biosimilars, but none have delved deeper into how patients view biologics and switching of these. Considering Denmark has one of the highest biosimilar uptake worldwide, the aim of this study was to investigate how Danish patients with psoriasis, arthritic diseases, or inflammatory bowel disease perceive biosimilars. Twelve participants were semi-structurally interviewed in either a focus group or an internet-based, individual interview between May 2019 and July 2019. Content analysis was inductively applied. Participants on originators voiced more reluctance towards using biosimilars than those already using them. Both participants using originator and biosimilar products expressed concerns about reoccurrence of disease symptoms due to differences in effectiveness and safety. Participants generally struggled with understanding biosimilarity, and they voiced a need to be well-informed about switching. They were all aware of and accepted how healthcare budget restrictions played a role in the push to use biosimilars. To improve biosimilar uptake and willingness to switch to a biosimilar, patient-centred information on efficacy and safety and explanation of the societal benefits of the savings from using biosimilars must be carefully communicated.

U2 - 10.1111/bcpt.13719

DO - 10.1111/bcpt.13719

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 35261174

VL - 130

SP - 581

EP - 591

JO - Basic and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology

JF - Basic and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology

SN - 1742-7835

IS - 5

ER -

ID: 300065660