The Role of International Criminal Tribunals in Shaping the Historical Accounts of Genocide
Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Book chapter › Research › peer-review
Standard
The Role of International Criminal Tribunals in Shaping the Historical Accounts of Genocide. / Aksenova, Marina.
Law and Memory: Towards Legal Governance of History. ed. / Uladzislau Belavusau; Aleksandra Gliszczyńska-Grabias. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2017. p. 48-69.Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Book chapter › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - CHAP
T1 - The Role of International Criminal Tribunals in Shaping the Historical Accounts of Genocide
AU - Aksenova, Marina
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - An international consensus on the need to prosecute and punish mass atrocities is arguably the strongest evidence of the existence of the global collective consciousness. The Nuremberg Tribunal challenged traditional world order centering on states and their intentions and overlooking abuses sanctioned by the state or flowing from state policy. This tribunal was the first international court tasked with trying individuals responsible for crimes committed on a large scale by the oppressive regime. Despite some dissenting voices, the Nuremberg trial was neither a show trial, nor was it a purely domestic criminal law process. It was rather a way of expressing international outrage with Germany’s aggression through judicial means. Ever since this historic shift occurred, the field of international criminal law has been increasingly vested with the mounting number of objectives – deterrence, retribution, transitional justice, reconciliation, and, finally, setting the historical record. Some of these goals are conflicting. The chapter critically assesses the latter objective and situates it among other considerations. The crime of genocide, first prosecuted internationally by the ad hoc tribunals in the 1990’s, exemplifies the main argument in this chapter: providing historical account of events is an essential and inalienable part of international criminal law, but it is limited in scope and subject to strict legal requirements.
AB - An international consensus on the need to prosecute and punish mass atrocities is arguably the strongest evidence of the existence of the global collective consciousness. The Nuremberg Tribunal challenged traditional world order centering on states and their intentions and overlooking abuses sanctioned by the state or flowing from state policy. This tribunal was the first international court tasked with trying individuals responsible for crimes committed on a large scale by the oppressive regime. Despite some dissenting voices, the Nuremberg trial was neither a show trial, nor was it a purely domestic criminal law process. It was rather a way of expressing international outrage with Germany’s aggression through judicial means. Ever since this historic shift occurred, the field of international criminal law has been increasingly vested with the mounting number of objectives – deterrence, retribution, transitional justice, reconciliation, and, finally, setting the historical record. Some of these goals are conflicting. The chapter critically assesses the latter objective and situates it among other considerations. The crime of genocide, first prosecuted internationally by the ad hoc tribunals in the 1990’s, exemplifies the main argument in this chapter: providing historical account of events is an essential and inalienable part of international criminal law, but it is limited in scope and subject to strict legal requirements.
U2 - 10.1017/9781316986172.003
DO - 10.1017/9781316986172.003
M3 - Book chapter
SN - 9781107188754
SP - 48
EP - 69
BT - Law and Memory
A2 - Belavusau, Uladzislau
A2 - Gliszczyńska-Grabias, Aleksandra
PB - Cambridge University Press
CY - Cambridge
ER -
ID: 160085659