Between Universalism and Regional Law and Politics: A Comparative History of the American, European and African Human Rights Systems

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

Between Universalism and Regional Law and Politics: A Comparative History of the American, European and African Human Rights Systems. / Huneeus, Alexandra; Madsen, Mikael Rask.

In: International Journal of Constitutional Law, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2018, p. 136-160.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Huneeus, A & Madsen, MR 2018, 'Between Universalism and Regional Law and Politics: A Comparative History of the American, European and African Human Rights Systems', International Journal of Constitutional Law, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 136-160. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moy011

APA

Huneeus, A., & Madsen, M. R. (2018). Between Universalism and Regional Law and Politics: A Comparative History of the American, European and African Human Rights Systems. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 16(1), 136-160. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moy011

Vancouver

Huneeus A, Madsen MR. Between Universalism and Regional Law and Politics: A Comparative History of the American, European and African Human Rights Systems. International Journal of Constitutional Law. 2018;16(1):136-160. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moy011

Author

Huneeus, Alexandra ; Madsen, Mikael Rask. / Between Universalism and Regional Law and Politics: A Comparative History of the American, European and African Human Rights Systems. In: International Journal of Constitutional Law. 2018 ; Vol. 16, No. 1. pp. 136-160.

Bibtex

@article{6ce13db45dda4f48a1d51b92468a8a50,
title = "Between Universalism and Regional Law and Politics:: A Comparative History of the American, European and African Human Rights Systems",
abstract = "This article represents a first systematic attempt to compare the institutional histories of the regional human rights systems in Europe, the Americas, and Africa. It argues that the three main regional human rights systems have enacted common scripts that have produced relatively similar institutional models across the regions under scrutiny. This is not to deny, however, the enormous variation among the systems; nor is it to deny the role of local social and political contexts in shaping them. Rather, the analysis seeks precisely to identify both the common institutional scripts and the regional particularities to render the general history of regional human rights courts and commissions-a key component of the larger history of human rights that has been largely overlooked in current debates. We argue that the dynamics of the Cold War initially shaped the bounds within which actors in each region came to realize, re-shape, and re-signify common institutional scripts.",
author = "Alexandra Huneeus and Madsen, {Mikael Rask}",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1093/icon/moy011",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "136--160",
journal = "International Journal of Constitutional Law",
issn = "1474-2640",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Between Universalism and Regional Law and Politics:

T2 - A Comparative History of the American, European and African Human Rights Systems

AU - Huneeus, Alexandra

AU - Madsen, Mikael Rask

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - This article represents a first systematic attempt to compare the institutional histories of the regional human rights systems in Europe, the Americas, and Africa. It argues that the three main regional human rights systems have enacted common scripts that have produced relatively similar institutional models across the regions under scrutiny. This is not to deny, however, the enormous variation among the systems; nor is it to deny the role of local social and political contexts in shaping them. Rather, the analysis seeks precisely to identify both the common institutional scripts and the regional particularities to render the general history of regional human rights courts and commissions-a key component of the larger history of human rights that has been largely overlooked in current debates. We argue that the dynamics of the Cold War initially shaped the bounds within which actors in each region came to realize, re-shape, and re-signify common institutional scripts.

AB - This article represents a first systematic attempt to compare the institutional histories of the regional human rights systems in Europe, the Americas, and Africa. It argues that the three main regional human rights systems have enacted common scripts that have produced relatively similar institutional models across the regions under scrutiny. This is not to deny, however, the enormous variation among the systems; nor is it to deny the role of local social and political contexts in shaping them. Rather, the analysis seeks precisely to identify both the common institutional scripts and the regional particularities to render the general history of regional human rights courts and commissions-a key component of the larger history of human rights that has been largely overlooked in current debates. We argue that the dynamics of the Cold War initially shaped the bounds within which actors in each region came to realize, re-shape, and re-signify common institutional scripts.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048112827&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/icon/moy011

DO - 10.1093/icon/moy011

M3 - Journal article

VL - 16

SP - 136

EP - 160

JO - International Journal of Constitutional Law

JF - International Journal of Constitutional Law

SN - 1474-2640

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 187658772