Time to rethink the interaction between ex-ante-sector regulation and ex-post-competition law
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Time to rethink the interaction between ex-ante-sector regulation and ex-post-competition law. / Bergqvist, Christian.
In: EU Law Live - The Week, No. 21 - 2024, 2024.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Time to rethink the interaction between ex-ante-sector regulation and ex-post-competition law
AU - Bergqvist, Christian
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - It follows directly from the EU’s legal structures that in the case of conflicts between competition law and any secondary regulation, priority must be given to the former by virtue of its higher place in the legal hierarchy. Regardless, in DB Station (C-721/20), at para. 81, the European Court of Justice suggested halting competition law enforcement if sectoral regulation derived from an EU Directive was available, indicating a different position. In the underlying case, a potential victim of excessive pricing for railroad services in Germany had complained. Initially, the complaint was made to the sector regulator designated under the EU Directive, but following discontent with the lack of progress due to appeals, etc., an Article 102 case had been tabled before a local court. Confronted with this, the court referred questions to the European Court of Justice, yielding a ruling that does not comport with the notion of competition law as superior and always applicable regardless of sectoral regulation. However, it does comport with what tacitly have been practiced for years by DG COMP.
AB - It follows directly from the EU’s legal structures that in the case of conflicts between competition law and any secondary regulation, priority must be given to the former by virtue of its higher place in the legal hierarchy. Regardless, in DB Station (C-721/20), at para. 81, the European Court of Justice suggested halting competition law enforcement if sectoral regulation derived from an EU Directive was available, indicating a different position. In the underlying case, a potential victim of excessive pricing for railroad services in Germany had complained. Initially, the complaint was made to the sector regulator designated under the EU Directive, but following discontent with the lack of progress due to appeals, etc., an Article 102 case had been tabled before a local court. Confronted with this, the court referred questions to the European Court of Justice, yielding a ruling that does not comport with the notion of competition law as superior and always applicable regardless of sectoral regulation. However, it does comport with what tacitly have been practiced for years by DG COMP.
M3 - Journal article
JO - EU Law Live - The Week
JF - EU Law Live - The Week
IS - 21 - 2024
ER -
ID: 390588268