The End of Eastern Territoriality? CJEU Compliance in the New Member States
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
The End of Eastern Territoriality? CJEU Compliance in the New Member States. / Vasev, Nikolay Rumenov; Vrangbæk, Karsten; Krepelka, Filip.
I: Comparative European Politics, Bind 15, Nr. 3, 2017, s. 459–477.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - The End of Eastern Territoriality?
T2 - CJEU Compliance in the New Member States
AU - Vasev, Nikolay Rumenov
AU - Vrangbæk, Karsten
AU - Krepelka, Filip
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - How does compliance to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) rulings on patient mobility in the new Member States compare to the old Member States? Studying the new Member States’ compliance practices would highlight the state of territoriality, the CJEU’s effective influence and the European healthcare union’s strength in the new Members. In order to deliver a structured analysis and transferrable results, we compare Poland, the Czech Republic and Bulgaria with France and Germany. The countries are selected on the basis of the commonalities in their systems’ organization. For the results in the old Member States we rely on Obermaier’s 2009 “The End of Territoriality”. The study is qualitative in nature and relies mostly on qualitative semi-structured interviews with experts from ministries of health, health insurers and legal experts from all three countries. We distinguish between formal and informal compliance and based on this we advance an analytical framework for a systematic study of CJEU compliance across the EU. Our findings show a heterogeneous picture of the countries, with all three of them demonstrating different modes of compliance. This is due to distinct domestic conditions, ranging from insurance funds’ amenability, national courts’ complaisance and state administration’s obstinacy.
AB - How does compliance to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) rulings on patient mobility in the new Member States compare to the old Member States? Studying the new Member States’ compliance practices would highlight the state of territoriality, the CJEU’s effective influence and the European healthcare union’s strength in the new Members. In order to deliver a structured analysis and transferrable results, we compare Poland, the Czech Republic and Bulgaria with France and Germany. The countries are selected on the basis of the commonalities in their systems’ organization. For the results in the old Member States we rely on Obermaier’s 2009 “The End of Territoriality”. The study is qualitative in nature and relies mostly on qualitative semi-structured interviews with experts from ministries of health, health insurers and legal experts from all three countries. We distinguish between formal and informal compliance and based on this we advance an analytical framework for a systematic study of CJEU compliance across the EU. Our findings show a heterogeneous picture of the countries, with all three of them demonstrating different modes of compliance. This is due to distinct domestic conditions, ranging from insurance funds’ amenability, national courts’ complaisance and state administration’s obstinacy.
KW - Faculty of Social Sciences
KW - CJEU rulings compliance
KW - patient mobility
KW - Eastern European Member States
KW - European healthcare union
U2 - 10.1057/cep.2016.9
DO - 10.1057/cep.2016.9
M3 - Journal article
VL - 15
SP - 459
EP - 477
JO - Comparative European Politics
JF - Comparative European Politics
SN - 1472-4790
IS - 3
ER -
ID: 144502025