Coerenţă jurisdicţională şi procedura trimiterii preliminare: Articolul 267 TFUE – cale de atac pentru particulari în scopul asigurării coerenţei jurisdicţionale în Europa
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning
Standard
Coerenţă jurisdicţională şi procedura trimiterii preliminare : Articolul 267 TFUE – cale de atac pentru particulari în scopul asigurării coerenţei jurisdicţionale în Europa. / Broberg, Morten.
I: Revista Romana de Drept European, Nr. 1, 2016, s. 59-82.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Coerenţă jurisdicţională şi procedura trimiterii preliminare
T2 - Articolul 267 TFUE – cale de atac pentru particulari în scopul asigurării coerenţei jurisdicţionale în Europa
AU - Broberg, Morten
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - This article examines how private parties may use the preliminary referenceprocedure in Article 267 TFEU to attain judicial coherence. Even though, inprinciple, the preliminary reference procedure is not a remedy available to privateparties, in practice such parties have been able to draw on the procedure inorder to further their own interests. To analyse this, the article first considers thepreliminary rulings’ erga omnes effect. Thereupon follows an examination of howa private party may go about actually using the preliminary reference procedure.This is followed by an account of how a private party may seek to influence theactual formulation of the national court’s preliminary questions. Next, the articleconsiders a private party’s possibilities of influencing the preliminary referenceprocedure before the Court of Justice of the European Union as well as the factthat since the preliminary reference procedure is not conceived as an inter partesremedy it does not provide for the usual ‘right of defence components’. Finally, amodest proposal for improving the procedure is presented.
AB - This article examines how private parties may use the preliminary referenceprocedure in Article 267 TFEU to attain judicial coherence. Even though, inprinciple, the preliminary reference procedure is not a remedy available to privateparties, in practice such parties have been able to draw on the procedure inorder to further their own interests. To analyse this, the article first considers thepreliminary rulings’ erga omnes effect. Thereupon follows an examination of howa private party may go about actually using the preliminary reference procedure.This is followed by an account of how a private party may seek to influence theactual formulation of the national court’s preliminary questions. Next, the articleconsiders a private party’s possibilities of influencing the preliminary referenceprocedure before the Court of Justice of the European Union as well as the factthat since the preliminary reference procedure is not conceived as an inter partesremedy it does not provide for the usual ‘right of defence components’. Finally, amodest proposal for improving the procedure is presented.
M3 - Tidsskriftartikel
SP - 59
EP - 82
JO - Revista Romana de Drept European
JF - Revista Romana de Drept European
SN - 2068-8083
IS - 1
ER -
ID: 161391362