The Self-Legitimation of Global Governance Institutions: A Comparative Overview of Normative Justifications in Global Governance
Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport › Bidrag til bog/antologi › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
The Self-Legitimation of Global Governance Institutions: A Comparative Overview of Normative Justifications in Global Governance. / Stappert, Nora; Gregoratti, Catia.
Legitimation and Delegitimation in Global Governance: Practices, Justifications, and Audiences. red. / Magdalena Bexell; Kristina Jönsson; Anders Uhlin. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2022. s. 119-139.Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport › Bidrag til bog/antologi › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - CHAP
T1 - The Self-Legitimation of Global Governance Institutions: A Comparative Overview of Normative Justifications in Global Governance
AU - Stappert, Nora
AU - Gregoratti, Catia
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - This chapter compares the normative justifications that global governance institutions (GGIs) provide in their public statements in order to legitimate themselves and through which they give reasons for their right to rule. Drawing on a comprehensive content analysis of annual reports published by nine GGIs between 1985 and 2017, the chapter analyzes the normative underpinnings of legitimation regarding the core purpose, procedures, and performance of GGIs. Moreover, it explores whether these justifications have been subject to change. The chapter shows that the main purpose that GGIs communicated has stayed remarkably stable over time. It emphasizes the central, but at times overlooked, role of legality in purpose-based normative justifications. Justifications concerning GGI procedures and performance, in turn, were more amenable to change. The chapter demonstrates that economic and regional GGIs more frequently relied on technocratic norms, while multistakeholder institutions were more likely to refer to democratic norms. In the case of GGIs with a comparatively high level of authority, such self-legitimation invoking democratic norms increased following periods of contestation of the institution’s authority. Such an increase, however, was typically only temporary.
AB - This chapter compares the normative justifications that global governance institutions (GGIs) provide in their public statements in order to legitimate themselves and through which they give reasons for their right to rule. Drawing on a comprehensive content analysis of annual reports published by nine GGIs between 1985 and 2017, the chapter analyzes the normative underpinnings of legitimation regarding the core purpose, procedures, and performance of GGIs. Moreover, it explores whether these justifications have been subject to change. The chapter shows that the main purpose that GGIs communicated has stayed remarkably stable over time. It emphasizes the central, but at times overlooked, role of legality in purpose-based normative justifications. Justifications concerning GGI procedures and performance, in turn, were more amenable to change. The chapter demonstrates that economic and regional GGIs more frequently relied on technocratic norms, while multistakeholder institutions were more likely to refer to democratic norms. In the case of GGIs with a comparatively high level of authority, such self-legitimation invoking democratic norms increased following periods of contestation of the institution’s authority. Such an increase, however, was typically only temporary.
M3 - Book chapter
SP - 119
EP - 139
BT - Legitimation and Delegitimation in Global Governance: Practices, Justifications, and Audiences
A2 - Bexell, Magdalena
A2 - Jönsson, Kristina
A2 - Uhlin, Anders
PB - Oxford University Press
CY - Oxford
ER -
ID: 334856923