Standard
Social Media Platforms as Public Health Arbiters : Global Ethical Considerations on Privacy, Legal and Cultural Issues Associated with Suicide Detection Algorithms. / Celedonia, Karen; Wilson, Michael; Corrales Compagnucci, Marcelo.
AI in eHealth: Human Autonomy, Data Governance & Privacy in Healthcare. red. / Marcelo Corrales Compagnucci; Michael Wilson; Mark Fenwick; Nikolaus Forgó; Till Bärnighausen. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2022. s. 68-86 (Cambridge Bioethics and Law ).
Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport › Bidrag til bog/antologi › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
Celedonia, K, Wilson, M
& Corrales Compagnucci, M 2022,
Social Media Platforms as Public Health Arbiters: Global Ethical Considerations on Privacy, Legal and Cultural Issues Associated with Suicide Detection Algorithms. i M Corrales Compagnucci, M Wilson, M Fenwick, N Forgó & T Bärnighausen (red),
AI in eHealth: Human Autonomy, Data Governance & Privacy in Healthcare. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Cambridge Bioethics and Law , s. 68-86.
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108921923.006APA
Celedonia, K., Wilson, M.
, & Corrales Compagnucci, M. (2022).
Social Media Platforms as Public Health Arbiters: Global Ethical Considerations on Privacy, Legal and Cultural Issues Associated with Suicide Detection Algorithms. I M. Corrales Compagnucci, M. Wilson, M. Fenwick, N. Forgó, & T. Bärnighausen (red.),
AI in eHealth: Human Autonomy, Data Governance & Privacy in Healthcare (s. 68-86). Cambridge University Press. Cambridge Bioethics and Law
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108921923.006Vancouver
Celedonia K, Wilson M
, Corrales Compagnucci M.
Social Media Platforms as Public Health Arbiters: Global Ethical Considerations on Privacy, Legal and Cultural Issues Associated with Suicide Detection Algorithms. I Corrales Compagnucci M, Wilson M, Fenwick M, Forgó N, Bärnighausen T, red., AI in eHealth: Human Autonomy, Data Governance & Privacy in Healthcare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2022. s. 68-86. (Cambridge Bioethics and Law ).
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108921923.006Author
Celedonia, Karen ; Wilson, Michael ; Corrales Compagnucci, Marcelo. / Social Media Platforms as Public Health Arbiters : Global Ethical Considerations on Privacy, Legal and Cultural Issues Associated with Suicide Detection Algorithms. AI in eHealth: Human Autonomy, Data Governance & Privacy in Healthcare. red. / Marcelo Corrales Compagnucci ; Michael Wilson ; Mark Fenwick ; Nikolaus Forgó ; Till Bärnighausen. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2022. s. 68-86 (Cambridge Bioethics and Law ).
Bibtex
@inbook{f5285778b40949e7a00a1a16c84e8026,
title = "Social Media Platforms as Public Health Arbiters: Global Ethical Considerations on Privacy, Legal and Cultural Issues Associated with Suicide Detection Algorithms",
abstract = "The emergence of Facebook{\textquoteright}s suicide prevention algorithm has prompted discussion around whether social media platforms have a role to play in public health surveillance. Concerns have been raised about an entity that is not a public interest health authority collecting and acting on the private health information of its users, particularly sensitive data like an individual{\textquoteright}s mental health status. Mental illnesses are still heavily stigmatised, despite continued efforts to normalise these conditions in some areas of the world. Depending on a user{\textquoteright}s geographic location, the ramifications of the suicide detection algorithms generating false positives for suicide risk could have severe consequences. The present chapter continues this discourse by examining the ethical implications of Facebook{\textquoteright}s suicide prevention algorithm from privacy, legal, and cultural perspectives.",
author = "Karen Celedonia and Michael Wilson and {Corrales Compagnucci}, Marcelo",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1017/9781108921923.006",
language = "English",
isbn = "110883096X",
series = "Cambridge Bioethics and Law ",
pages = "68--86",
editor = "{Corrales Compagnucci}, Marcelo and Wilson, {Michael } and Mark Fenwick and Nikolaus Forg{\'o} and Till B{\"a}rnighausen",
booktitle = "AI in eHealth",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
address = "United Kingdom",
}
RIS
TY - CHAP
T1 - Social Media Platforms as Public Health Arbiters
T2 - Global Ethical Considerations on Privacy, Legal and Cultural Issues Associated with Suicide Detection Algorithms
AU - Celedonia, Karen
AU - Wilson, Michael
AU - Corrales Compagnucci, Marcelo
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - The emergence of Facebook’s suicide prevention algorithm has prompted discussion around whether social media platforms have a role to play in public health surveillance. Concerns have been raised about an entity that is not a public interest health authority collecting and acting on the private health information of its users, particularly sensitive data like an individual’s mental health status. Mental illnesses are still heavily stigmatised, despite continued efforts to normalise these conditions in some areas of the world. Depending on a user’s geographic location, the ramifications of the suicide detection algorithms generating false positives for suicide risk could have severe consequences. The present chapter continues this discourse by examining the ethical implications of Facebook’s suicide prevention algorithm from privacy, legal, and cultural perspectives.
AB - The emergence of Facebook’s suicide prevention algorithm has prompted discussion around whether social media platforms have a role to play in public health surveillance. Concerns have been raised about an entity that is not a public interest health authority collecting and acting on the private health information of its users, particularly sensitive data like an individual’s mental health status. Mental illnesses are still heavily stigmatised, despite continued efforts to normalise these conditions in some areas of the world. Depending on a user’s geographic location, the ramifications of the suicide detection algorithms generating false positives for suicide risk could have severe consequences. The present chapter continues this discourse by examining the ethical implications of Facebook’s suicide prevention algorithm from privacy, legal, and cultural perspectives.
U2 - 10.1017/9781108921923.006
DO - 10.1017/9781108921923.006
M3 - Book chapter
SN - 110883096X
T3 - Cambridge Bioethics and Law
SP - 68
EP - 86
BT - AI in eHealth
A2 - Corrales Compagnucci, Marcelo
A2 - Wilson, Michael
A2 - Fenwick, Mark
A2 - Forgó, Nikolaus
A2 - Bärnighausen, Till
PB - Cambridge University Press
CY - Cambridge
ER -
