Ritual Slaughter in the Modern Constitutional State: Religious Exceptions to Secular Animal Protection Laws

Publikation: Konferencebidrag › Konferenceabstrakt til konference › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

Ritual Slaughter in the Modern Constitutional State : Religious Exceptions to Secular Animal Protection Laws. / Afsah, Ebrahim.

2016. Abstract fra Harvard Workshop on Animals in Comparative Constitutional Law, Cambridge, Mass., USA.

Publikation: Konferencebidrag › Konferenceabstrakt til konference › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Afsah, E 2016, 'Ritual Slaughter in the Modern Constitutional State: Religious Exceptions to Secular Animal Protection Laws', Harvard Workshop on Animals in Comparative Constitutional Law, Cambridge, Mass., USA, 18/02/2016 - 19/02/2016.

APA

Afsah, E. (2016). Ritual Slaughter in the Modern Constitutional State: Religious Exceptions to Secular Animal Protection Laws. Abstract fra Harvard Workshop on Animals in Comparative Constitutional Law, Cambridge, Mass., USA.

Vancouver

Afsah E. Ritual Slaughter in the Modern Constitutional State: Religious Exceptions to Secular Animal Protection Laws. 2016. Abstract fra Harvard Workshop on Animals in Comparative Constitutional Law, Cambridge, Mass., USA.

Author

Afsah, Ebrahim. / Ritual Slaughter in the Modern Constitutional State : Religious Exceptions to Secular Animal Protection Laws. Abstract fra Harvard Workshop on Animals in Comparative Constitutional Law, Cambridge, Mass., USA.2 s.

Bibtex

@conference{eec693da8bd7400b88639a18aaca6e56,
title = "Ritual Slaughter in the Modern Constitutional State: Religious Exceptions to Secular Animal Protection Laws",
abstract = "In this proposed presentation I intend to give a historical overview of the political and constitutional debates in selected European countries – including Germany, France, Great Britain, Holland and Scandinavia – from the nineteenth century to the present day, paying special attention to the shift in emphasis after mass Muslim immigration began in the 1960s. In this sense, the protection of animal welfare as a legitimate concern of the state can be placed in a wider context of secular concerns for vulnerable groups that violently clashes with pre-modern notions of religious or cultural autonomy. Similar in nature if not necessarily in intensity to questions of forced and/or underage marriage, male circumcision and female genital mutilation, the commitment of the secular state to animal welfare cannot summarily be rejected by demands for religious freedom.",
author = "Ebrahim Afsah",
year = "2016",
month = feb,
day = "18",
language = "English",
note = "Harvard Workshop on Animals in Comparative Constitutional Law ; Conference date: 18-02-2016 Through 19-02-2016",

}

RIS

TY - ABST

T1 - Ritual Slaughter in the Modern Constitutional State

T2 - Harvard Workshop on Animals in Comparative Constitutional Law

AU - Afsah, Ebrahim

PY - 2016/2/18

Y1 - 2016/2/18

N2 - In this proposed presentation I intend to give a historical overview of the political and constitutional debates in selected European countries – including Germany, France, Great Britain, Holland and Scandinavia – from the nineteenth century to the present day, paying special attention to the shift in emphasis after mass Muslim immigration began in the 1960s. In this sense, the protection of animal welfare as a legitimate concern of the state can be placed in a wider context of secular concerns for vulnerable groups that violently clashes with pre-modern notions of religious or cultural autonomy. Similar in nature if not necessarily in intensity to questions of forced and/or underage marriage, male circumcision and female genital mutilation, the commitment of the secular state to animal welfare cannot summarily be rejected by demands for religious freedom.

AB - In this proposed presentation I intend to give a historical overview of the political and constitutional debates in selected European countries – including Germany, France, Great Britain, Holland and Scandinavia – from the nineteenth century to the present day, paying special attention to the shift in emphasis after mass Muslim immigration began in the 1960s. In this sense, the protection of animal welfare as a legitimate concern of the state can be placed in a wider context of secular concerns for vulnerable groups that violently clashes with pre-modern notions of religious or cultural autonomy. Similar in nature if not necessarily in intensity to questions of forced and/or underage marriage, male circumcision and female genital mutilation, the commitment of the secular state to animal welfare cannot summarily be rejected by demands for religious freedom.

M3 - Conference abstract for conference

Y2 - 18 February 2016 through 19 February 2016

ER -

ID: 181678169