Framing Waste as a Common Treasury to Facilitate the Circular Economy

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport › Bidrag til bog/antologi › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

Framing Waste as a Common Treasury to Facilitate the Circular Economy. / Steenmans, Katrien.

Property Law Perspectives VIII. red. / J Robbie; F Vavourakis; I Allegranti; V Smári Petersen; A Radonjić. Eleven International Publishing, 2023. (Maastricht Law Series, Bind 29).

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport › Bidrag til bog/antologi › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Steenmans, K 2023, Framing Waste as a Common Treasury to Facilitate the Circular Economy. i J Robbie, F Vavourakis, I Allegranti, V Smári Petersen & A Radonjić (red), Property Law Perspectives VIII. Eleven International Publishing, Maastricht Law Series, bind 29.

APA

Steenmans, K. (2023). Framing Waste as a Common Treasury to Facilitate the Circular Economy. I J. Robbie, F. Vavourakis, I. Allegranti, V. Smári Petersen, & A. Radonjić (red.), Property Law Perspectives VIII Eleven International Publishing. Maastricht Law Series Bind 29

Vancouver

Steenmans K. Framing Waste as a Common Treasury to Facilitate the Circular Economy. I Robbie J, Vavourakis F, Allegranti I, Smári Petersen V, Radonjić A, red., Property Law Perspectives VIII. Eleven International Publishing. 2023. (Maastricht Law Series, Bind 29).

Author

Steenmans, Katrien. / Framing Waste as a Common Treasury to Facilitate the Circular Economy. Property Law Perspectives VIII. red. / J Robbie ; F Vavourakis ; I Allegranti ; V Smári Petersen ; A Radonjić. Eleven International Publishing, 2023. (Maastricht Law Series, Bind 29).

Bibtex

@inbook{038c93cb8ae748e9a05146a369cc5493,
title = "Framing Waste as a Common Treasury to Facilitate the Circular Economy",
abstract = "The unsustainable amounts of waste currently produced are hugely problematic – resources are being {\textquoteleft}wasted{\textquoteright} and there are numerous issues related to current waste management operations. Many different laws and policies have been introduced to tackle the {\textquoteleft}wicked{\textquoteright} problem of the existing waste crisis, including on the circular economy in which wastes and resources are {\textquoteleft}looped{\textquoteright} back into systems through reuse, recycling, and other recovery to promote sustainable development. Yet, these have neither had the desired nor required transformative effect. This chapter therefore examines recasting waste as a common treasury that may, combined with other existing laws and policies, incentivise the prevention and sustainable circular management of waste. Malcolm and Clarke{\textquoteright}s understanding of the concept of common treasury to describe the physical nature and importance of a resource, rather than its legal nature, is adopted in this chapter. The aim of this chapter is two-fold. First, the possible benefits of reconceiving waste as a common treasury are evaluated. Second, the impacts of the private, communal, state, and no property in waste are examined to identify the most appropriate property scheme for waste to operate as a common treasury. This chapter therefore contributes to furthering arguments introduced by Malcolm and Clarke on the notion of common treasury, and their consideration of the most fitting property interests, by investigating the particular example of the man-made resource of waste in contrast to their examination of a natural resource, water",
author = "Katrien Steenmans",
year = "2023",
language = "English",
isbn = " 9789047301714",
series = "Maastricht Law Series",
editor = "J Robbie and F Vavourakis and I Allegranti and {Sm{\'a}ri Petersen}, V and A Radonji{\'c}",
booktitle = "Property Law Perspectives VIII",
publisher = "Eleven International Publishing",

}

RIS

TY - CHAP

T1 - Framing Waste as a Common Treasury to Facilitate the Circular Economy

AU - Steenmans, Katrien

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - The unsustainable amounts of waste currently produced are hugely problematic – resources are being ‘wasted’ and there are numerous issues related to current waste management operations. Many different laws and policies have been introduced to tackle the ‘wicked’ problem of the existing waste crisis, including on the circular economy in which wastes and resources are ‘looped’ back into systems through reuse, recycling, and other recovery to promote sustainable development. Yet, these have neither had the desired nor required transformative effect. This chapter therefore examines recasting waste as a common treasury that may, combined with other existing laws and policies, incentivise the prevention and sustainable circular management of waste. Malcolm and Clarke’s understanding of the concept of common treasury to describe the physical nature and importance of a resource, rather than its legal nature, is adopted in this chapter. The aim of this chapter is two-fold. First, the possible benefits of reconceiving waste as a common treasury are evaluated. Second, the impacts of the private, communal, state, and no property in waste are examined to identify the most appropriate property scheme for waste to operate as a common treasury. This chapter therefore contributes to furthering arguments introduced by Malcolm and Clarke on the notion of common treasury, and their consideration of the most fitting property interests, by investigating the particular example of the man-made resource of waste in contrast to their examination of a natural resource, water

AB - The unsustainable amounts of waste currently produced are hugely problematic – resources are being ‘wasted’ and there are numerous issues related to current waste management operations. Many different laws and policies have been introduced to tackle the ‘wicked’ problem of the existing waste crisis, including on the circular economy in which wastes and resources are ‘looped’ back into systems through reuse, recycling, and other recovery to promote sustainable development. Yet, these have neither had the desired nor required transformative effect. This chapter therefore examines recasting waste as a common treasury that may, combined with other existing laws and policies, incentivise the prevention and sustainable circular management of waste. Malcolm and Clarke’s understanding of the concept of common treasury to describe the physical nature and importance of a resource, rather than its legal nature, is adopted in this chapter. The aim of this chapter is two-fold. First, the possible benefits of reconceiving waste as a common treasury are evaluated. Second, the impacts of the private, communal, state, and no property in waste are examined to identify the most appropriate property scheme for waste to operate as a common treasury. This chapter therefore contributes to furthering arguments introduced by Malcolm and Clarke on the notion of common treasury, and their consideration of the most fitting property interests, by investigating the particular example of the man-made resource of waste in contrast to their examination of a natural resource, water

UR - https://www.elevenpub.com/en/product/100-14669_Property-Law-Perspectives-VIII

M3 - Book chapter

SN - 9789047301714

T3 - Maastricht Law Series

BT - Property Law Perspectives VIII

A2 - Robbie, J

A2 - Vavourakis, F

A2 - Allegranti, I

A2 - Smári Petersen, V

A2 - Radonjić, A

PB - Eleven International Publishing

ER -

ID: 331484566