Coerenţă jurisdicţională şi procedura trimiterii preliminare: Articolul 267 TFUE – cale de atac pentru particulari în scopul asigurării coerenţei jurisdicţionale în Europa

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning

Standard

Coerenţă jurisdicţională şi procedura trimiterii preliminare : Articolul 267 TFUE – cale de atac pentru particulari în scopul asigurării coerenţei jurisdicţionale în Europa. / Broberg, Morten.

I: Revista Romana de Drept European, Nr. 1, 2016, s. 59-82.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning

Harvard

Broberg, M 2016, 'Coerenţă jurisdicţională şi procedura trimiterii preliminare: Articolul 267 TFUE – cale de atac pentru particulari în scopul asigurării coerenţei jurisdicţionale în Europa', Revista Romana de Drept European, nr. 1, s. 59-82.

APA

Broberg, M. (2016). Coerenţă jurisdicţională şi procedura trimiterii preliminare: Articolul 267 TFUE – cale de atac pentru particulari în scopul asigurării coerenţei jurisdicţionale în Europa. Revista Romana de Drept European, (1), 59-82.

Vancouver

Broberg M. Coerenţă jurisdicţională şi procedura trimiterii preliminare: Articolul 267 TFUE – cale de atac pentru particulari în scopul asigurării coerenţei jurisdicţionale în Europa. Revista Romana de Drept European. 2016;(1):59-82.

Author

Broberg, Morten. / Coerenţă jurisdicţională şi procedura trimiterii preliminare : Articolul 267 TFUE – cale de atac pentru particulari în scopul asigurării coerenţei jurisdicţionale în Europa. I: Revista Romana de Drept European. 2016 ; Nr. 1. s. 59-82.

Bibtex

@article{704d24cf78594b16927208e114a1feaf,
title = "Coeren{\c t}{\u a} jurisdic{\c t}ional{\u a} {\c s}i procedura trimiterii preliminare: Articolul 267 TFUE – cale de atac pentru particulari {\^i}n scopul asigur{\u a}rii coeren{\c t}ei jurisdic{\c t}ionale {\^i}n Europa",
abstract = "This article examines how private parties may use the preliminary referenceprocedure in Article 267 TFEU to attain judicial coherence. Even though, inprinciple, the preliminary reference procedure is not a remedy available to privateparties, in practice such parties have been able to draw on the procedure inorder to further their own interests. To analyse this, the article first considers thepreliminary rulings{\textquoteright} erga omnes effect. Thereupon follows an examination of howa private party may go about actually using the preliminary reference procedure.This is followed by an account of how a private party may seek to influence theactual formulation of the national court{\textquoteright}s preliminary questions. Next, the articleconsiders a private party{\textquoteright}s possibilities of influencing the preliminary referenceprocedure before the Court of Justice of the European Union as well as the factthat since the preliminary reference procedure is not conceived as an inter partesremedy it does not provide for the usual {\textquoteleft}right of defence components{\textquoteright}. Finally, amodest proposal for improving the procedure is presented.",
author = "Morten Broberg",
year = "2016",
language = "Rum{\ae}nsk",
pages = "59--82",
journal = "Revista Romana de Drept European",
issn = "2068-8083",
publisher = "Wolters Kluwer ",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Coerenţă jurisdicţională şi procedura trimiterii preliminare

T2 - Articolul 267 TFUE – cale de atac pentru particulari în scopul asigurării coerenţei jurisdicţionale în Europa

AU - Broberg, Morten

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - This article examines how private parties may use the preliminary referenceprocedure in Article 267 TFEU to attain judicial coherence. Even though, inprinciple, the preliminary reference procedure is not a remedy available to privateparties, in practice such parties have been able to draw on the procedure inorder to further their own interests. To analyse this, the article first considers thepreliminary rulings’ erga omnes effect. Thereupon follows an examination of howa private party may go about actually using the preliminary reference procedure.This is followed by an account of how a private party may seek to influence theactual formulation of the national court’s preliminary questions. Next, the articleconsiders a private party’s possibilities of influencing the preliminary referenceprocedure before the Court of Justice of the European Union as well as the factthat since the preliminary reference procedure is not conceived as an inter partesremedy it does not provide for the usual ‘right of defence components’. Finally, amodest proposal for improving the procedure is presented.

AB - This article examines how private parties may use the preliminary referenceprocedure in Article 267 TFEU to attain judicial coherence. Even though, inprinciple, the preliminary reference procedure is not a remedy available to privateparties, in practice such parties have been able to draw on the procedure inorder to further their own interests. To analyse this, the article first considers thepreliminary rulings’ erga omnes effect. Thereupon follows an examination of howa private party may go about actually using the preliminary reference procedure.This is followed by an account of how a private party may seek to influence theactual formulation of the national court’s preliminary questions. Next, the articleconsiders a private party’s possibilities of influencing the preliminary referenceprocedure before the Court of Justice of the European Union as well as the factthat since the preliminary reference procedure is not conceived as an inter partesremedy it does not provide for the usual ‘right of defence components’. Finally, amodest proposal for improving the procedure is presented.

M3 - Tidsskriftartikel

SP - 59

EP - 82

JO - Revista Romana de Drept European

JF - Revista Romana de Drept European

SN - 2068-8083

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 161391362