International Law Before English and Asian Courts: Finding the Judicial Role in the Separation of Powers

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

International Law Before English and Asian Courts: Finding the Judicial Role in the Separation of Powers. / Fikfak, Veronika.

In: Asian Journal of International Law, July 2013, pp 271-304, 23.07.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Fikfak, V 2013, 'International Law Before English and Asian Courts: Finding the Judicial Role in the Separation of Powers', Asian Journal of International Law, July 2013, pp 271-304. <https://ssrn.com/abstract=2297262>

APA

Fikfak, V. (2013). International Law Before English and Asian Courts: Finding the Judicial Role in the Separation of Powers. Asian Journal of International Law, July 2013, pp 271-304. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2297262

Vancouver

Fikfak V. International Law Before English and Asian Courts: Finding the Judicial Role in the Separation of Powers. Asian Journal of International Law, July 2013, pp 271-304. 2013 Jul 23.

Author

Fikfak, Veronika. / International Law Before English and Asian Courts: Finding the Judicial Role in the Separation of Powers. In: Asian Journal of International Law, July 2013, pp 271-304. 2013.

Bibtex

@article{2180cc9f900f43f0a86bb55f3fce39e4,
title = "International Law Before English and Asian Courts: Finding the Judicial Role in the Separation of Powers",
abstract = "This article questions the idea that the role of domestic courts in relation to international law is triggered only when international law is incorporated into domestic law by the other branches of government. It argues that domestic courts have extensive powers in defining their role vis-{\`a}-vis international law and influencing the relationship between domestic and international law. By going beyond the typical monist-dualist discussions, the first part of the article presents how English and American courts, by giving different meanings to the term “part”, reveal how they perceive their relationships with the other government branches and their role in relation to international law. The article then investigates whether similar judicial techniques can be identified in Asian courts{\textquoteright} treatment of international law. In showcasing the approaches of some Asian courts, the article provides snapshots of how these judges actively shape their role vis-{\`a}-vis international law and how they construct their relationships with the Legislature and the Executive.",
keywords = "domestic courts, international law, Asian courts, English courts",
author = "Veronika Fikfak",
year = "2013",
month = jul,
day = "23",
language = "English",
journal = "Asian Journal of International Law, July 2013, pp 271-304",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - International Law Before English and Asian Courts: Finding the Judicial Role in the Separation of Powers

AU - Fikfak, Veronika

PY - 2013/7/23

Y1 - 2013/7/23

N2 - This article questions the idea that the role of domestic courts in relation to international law is triggered only when international law is incorporated into domestic law by the other branches of government. It argues that domestic courts have extensive powers in defining their role vis-à-vis international law and influencing the relationship between domestic and international law. By going beyond the typical monist-dualist discussions, the first part of the article presents how English and American courts, by giving different meanings to the term “part”, reveal how they perceive their relationships with the other government branches and their role in relation to international law. The article then investigates whether similar judicial techniques can be identified in Asian courts’ treatment of international law. In showcasing the approaches of some Asian courts, the article provides snapshots of how these judges actively shape their role vis-à-vis international law and how they construct their relationships with the Legislature and the Executive.

AB - This article questions the idea that the role of domestic courts in relation to international law is triggered only when international law is incorporated into domestic law by the other branches of government. It argues that domestic courts have extensive powers in defining their role vis-à-vis international law and influencing the relationship between domestic and international law. By going beyond the typical monist-dualist discussions, the first part of the article presents how English and American courts, by giving different meanings to the term “part”, reveal how they perceive their relationships with the other government branches and their role in relation to international law. The article then investigates whether similar judicial techniques can be identified in Asian courts’ treatment of international law. In showcasing the approaches of some Asian courts, the article provides snapshots of how these judges actively shape their role vis-à-vis international law and how they construct their relationships with the Legislature and the Executive.

KW - domestic courts

KW - international law

KW - Asian courts

KW - English courts

M3 - Journal article

JO - Asian Journal of International Law, July 2013, pp 271-304

JF - Asian Journal of International Law, July 2013, pp 271-304

ER -

ID: 229031034