International Law Before English and Asian Courts: Finding the Judicial Role in the Separation of Powers
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
International Law Before English and Asian Courts: Finding the Judicial Role in the Separation of Powers. / Fikfak, Veronika.
In: Asian Journal of International Law, July 2013, pp 271-304, 23.07.2013.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - International Law Before English and Asian Courts: Finding the Judicial Role in the Separation of Powers
AU - Fikfak, Veronika
PY - 2013/7/23
Y1 - 2013/7/23
N2 - This article questions the idea that the role of domestic courts in relation to international law is triggered only when international law is incorporated into domestic law by the other branches of government. It argues that domestic courts have extensive powers in defining their role vis-à-vis international law and influencing the relationship between domestic and international law. By going beyond the typical monist-dualist discussions, the first part of the article presents how English and American courts, by giving different meanings to the term “part”, reveal how they perceive their relationships with the other government branches and their role in relation to international law. The article then investigates whether similar judicial techniques can be identified in Asian courts’ treatment of international law. In showcasing the approaches of some Asian courts, the article provides snapshots of how these judges actively shape their role vis-à-vis international law and how they construct their relationships with the Legislature and the Executive.
AB - This article questions the idea that the role of domestic courts in relation to international law is triggered only when international law is incorporated into domestic law by the other branches of government. It argues that domestic courts have extensive powers in defining their role vis-à-vis international law and influencing the relationship between domestic and international law. By going beyond the typical monist-dualist discussions, the first part of the article presents how English and American courts, by giving different meanings to the term “part”, reveal how they perceive their relationships with the other government branches and their role in relation to international law. The article then investigates whether similar judicial techniques can be identified in Asian courts’ treatment of international law. In showcasing the approaches of some Asian courts, the article provides snapshots of how these judges actively shape their role vis-à-vis international law and how they construct their relationships with the Legislature and the Executive.
KW - domestic courts
KW - international law
KW - Asian courts
KW - English courts
M3 - Journal article
JO - Asian Journal of International Law, July 2013, pp 271-304
JF - Asian Journal of International Law, July 2013, pp 271-304
ER -
ID: 229031034