AMICI - Amici Curiae in International Human Rights Courts

Civil society actors are lauded as central in setting and advancing human rights, and regularly engage with human rights courts (HRC) to influence the scope of rights protection. Increasingly, this includes when acting as ‘friends of court’—or ‘amici curiae’—through third party interventions (TPIs) in disputes between states and victims of human rights abuses. Anecdotal evidence suggests TPIs may affect HRCs’ outcomes, yet at present we lack comprehensive, systematic analysis and empirical evidence of how they do so. AMICI seeks to address this gap. It constructs a dataset of decisions with third-party interventions to investigate the role of third-party interveners and interventions on the bevhaviour of international human rights courts.

As the decision to allow or deny a TPI rests with the HRC, WP4 explains HRCs’ practices on TPIs.

A multidisciplinary research agenda lauds NGOs as foundational to the depth and breadth of European human rights protection. At the same time existing research highlights an increased presence of conservative groups and foreign private funds in the human rights system. It is against this background that AMICI seeks to empirical map the actors who seeks influence on human rights law through submission of third party interventions, the strategies they adopt and the effect of their interventions. By adopting an interdisciplinary approach and employing both quantitative and qualitative methods of analysis, AMICI contributes critical, empirically grounded knowledge on the role of TPIs in shaping human rights law.