ADJUST – Automatic Decision making and JUSTice: AI, court actors and the right to a fair trial

This project investigates the use of automatic systems and artificial intelligence in the administration of justice. It focuses in particular on the impact new technologies on the relationships of trust and shared notions of good practice in the administration of justice between judges and other court staff such as court clerks.

Generated with AI Gemini 2.0 Flash
Generated with AI Gemini 2.0 Flash

This Marie Skłodowska-Curie Action investigates the around 100 automatic systems that are planned or already in use in courts worldwide, conducting tasks from menial transcriptions to complex matters such as suggesting relevant precedent or estimating the risk of recidivism.

The project investigates these systems considering concerns such as efficiency of justice, the right to a fair trial and the impact of such systens on the relationships of trust and shared notions of justice and good adjudication practices between judges and other court staff.

Methodologically the project includes a general and quantitative part investigating AI systems employed in courts in general, and a thicker comparative analysis of the European Court of Human Rights, the Danish- and Italian judicial systems.

 

 

 

Forthcoming

Molbæk-Steensig, H., 2025: ‘Judges’ ad hoc use of Generative Artificial Intelligence: proactive innovation or a risk to the right to a fair trial?’ in ESIL Proceedings (Research Forum) Catania 2025.  

 

Researchers

Name Title Phone E-mail
Molbæk-Steensig, Helga Postdoc Marie Curie E-mail

Funding

Project period: May 2025 - December 2027

PI: Helga Molbæk-Steensig

PI social media

Project social media