Theory-Based Evaluation Meets Ambiguity: The Role of Janus Variables
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Documents
- Janus post print
Accepted author manuscript, 231 KB, PDF document
As theory-based evaluation (TBE) engages in situations where multiple stakeholders help develop complex program theory about dynamic phenomena in politically contested settings, it becomes difficult to develop and use program theory without ambiguity. The purpose of this article is to explore ambiguity as a fruitful perspective that helps TBE face current challenges. Literatures in organization theory and political theory are consulted in order to cultivate the concept of ambiguity. Janus variables (which work in two ways) and other ambiguous aspects of program theories are classified and exemplified. Stances towards ambiguity are considered, as are concrete steps that TBE evaluators can take to identify and deal with ambiguity in TBE.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | American Journal of Evaluation |
Volume | 39 |
Issue number | 1 |
Pages (from-to) | 6-23 |
Number of pages | 17 |
ISSN | 1098-2140 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Mar 2018 |
- Faculty of Social Sciences - theory-based evaluation, program theory, participatory evaluation , evaluation use, ambiguity
Research areas
Number of downloads are based on statistics from Google Scholar and www.ku.dk
No data available
ID: 182535989