If it ain´t evaluated, don´t fix it! The Politics of Evaluability in Occupational Health and Safety
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
If it ain´t evaluated, don´t fix it! The Politics of Evaluability in Occupational Health and Safety. / Dahler-Larsen, Peter; Sundby, Anna.
In: Politische Vierteljahresschrift, Vol. 60, 16.11.2019, p. 743-761.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - If it ain´t evaluated, don´t fix it!
T2 - The Politics of Evaluability in Occupational Health and Safety
AU - Dahler-Larsen, Peter
AU - Sundby, Anna
PY - 2019/11/16
Y1 - 2019/11/16
N2 - While the ideal of ever-more systematic evaluation is cherished in theEuropean Union (EU) and elsewhere, it remains difficult to provide robust evaluation results when evaluability is low. This paper uses evaluability assessment as a theoretical–analytical tool to explore the policy/evaluation interface in a contemporary context characterized by multilevel governance. What is the political function of (low) evaluability? This article comprises a case study of a policy instrument, workplace assessments, which have taken place for the last 30 years under Danish legislation as a consequence of EU framework directive 89/391 on occupational health and safety. The study includes a review of the most recent EU evaluation of the above-mentioned framework directive, other documents, and preliminary survey results. The official evaluation results are meagre due to seven underlying challenges to evaluability found at various levels of governance. The relatively low political priority given to occupational health and safety as a policy area may help explain why little has been done over three decades to increase the evaluability of the policy instruments prescribed by the framework directive. Low evaluability contributes to keeping a policy area free from potential contestation, especially in a normative context where evaluative evidence is a precondition for rational policy change
AB - While the ideal of ever-more systematic evaluation is cherished in theEuropean Union (EU) and elsewhere, it remains difficult to provide robust evaluation results when evaluability is low. This paper uses evaluability assessment as a theoretical–analytical tool to explore the policy/evaluation interface in a contemporary context characterized by multilevel governance. What is the political function of (low) evaluability? This article comprises a case study of a policy instrument, workplace assessments, which have taken place for the last 30 years under Danish legislation as a consequence of EU framework directive 89/391 on occupational health and safety. The study includes a review of the most recent EU evaluation of the above-mentioned framework directive, other documents, and preliminary survey results. The official evaluation results are meagre due to seven underlying challenges to evaluability found at various levels of governance. The relatively low political priority given to occupational health and safety as a policy area may help explain why little has been done over three decades to increase the evaluability of the policy instruments prescribed by the framework directive. Low evaluability contributes to keeping a policy area free from potential contestation, especially in a normative context where evaluative evidence is a precondition for rational policy change
KW - Faculty of Social Sciences
KW - Evaluation
KW - Evaluabilit
KW - Evaluability assessment
KW - Politics of evaluation
KW - Occupational Health and Safety
U2 - 10.1007/s11615-019-00190-w
DO - 10.1007/s11615-019-00190-w
M3 - Journal article
VL - 60
SP - 743
EP - 761
JO - Politische Vierteljahresschrift
JF - Politische Vierteljahresschrift
SN - 0032-3470
ER -
ID: 230387507