Scientific futures for a Rhetoric of Science: "We do this and they do that?" A Junior-Senior Scholar Session, RSA 2018, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA; 1 June 2018
Research output: Contribution to journal › Conference article › Research › peer-review
Documents
- Scientific_futures_for_a_Rhetoric_of_Science_RSA_2018_Minneapolis_Minnesota, USA_1_June_2018_(version_of_record)
Final published version, 256 KB, PDF document
Growing attention to a rift between epistemology and ontology, between words and things, sets new challenges and invigorations for a Rhetoric of Science that traditionally aims to “analyze and evaluate the persuasive communications of scientists” (Ceccarelli, 2017, para 6). Rhetoricians confront a vibrant, new intellectual space where scholars across disciplines are seeking to better account for bodies and moving to “include the materiality of our ambient environs” in their analyses (Rickert, 2013, p. x). The question, in light of material expansions, is what is a Rhetoric of Science, and what are its futures?
In response to the Rhetoric Society of America’s 2018 conference call for junior and senior scholars to discuss “major developments in rhetorical studies,” we offer a Feyerabendian innovation-meets-dogma performative session: the junior scholar, representing innovation, argues that Rhetoric of Science must move aggressively beyond a study of texts and scientific language to account for continuous technological, social, and biological entanglements; specifically, to expand the field’s practices to include neuro-cognitive approaches and other forms of experiment. The senior scholar, representing dogma, expresses caution, arguing that the domain of a Rhetoric of Science is still symbols and semiosis; specifically, that looking at “ambient rhetorics” and “entanglements” is another approach, not a foundational shift.
In response to the Rhetoric Society of America’s 2018 conference call for junior and senior scholars to discuss “major developments in rhetorical studies,” we offer a Feyerabendian innovation-meets-dogma performative session: the junior scholar, representing innovation, argues that Rhetoric of Science must move aggressively beyond a study of texts and scientific language to account for continuous technological, social, and biological entanglements; specifically, to expand the field’s practices to include neuro-cognitive approaches and other forms of experiment. The senior scholar, representing dogma, expresses caution, arguing that the domain of a Rhetoric of Science is still symbols and semiosis; specifically, that looking at “ambient rhetorics” and “entanglements” is another approach, not a foundational shift.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | POROI |
Volume | 14 |
Issue number | 2 |
Pages (from-to) | 1-13 |
Number of pages | 13 |
ISSN | 2151-2957 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2019 |
Event | Rhetoric Society of America 2018: Celebrating the Past. Building the Future - Minneapolis, United States Duration: 31 May 2018 → 3 Jun 2018 |
Conference
Conference | Rhetoric Society of America 2018 |
---|---|
Country | United States |
City | Minneapolis |
Period | 31/05/2018 → 03/06/2018 |
- Faculty of Humanities
Research areas
Number of downloads are based on statistics from Google Scholar and www.ku.dk
No data available
ID: 223622063