Transfer Learning by Asymmetric Image Weighting for Segmentation across Scanners

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearch

Standard

Transfer Learning by Asymmetric Image Weighting for Segmentation across Scanners. / Cheplygina, Veronika; Opbroek, Annegreet van; Ikram, M. Arfan; Vernooij, Meike W.; Bruijne, Marleen de.

In: arXiv.org, 2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearch

Harvard

Cheplygina, V, Opbroek, AV, Ikram, MA, Vernooij, MW & Bruijne, MD 2020, 'Transfer Learning by Asymmetric Image Weighting for Segmentation across Scanners', arXiv.org.

APA

Cheplygina, V., Opbroek, A. V., Ikram, M. A., Vernooij, M. W., & Bruijne, M. D. (2020). Transfer Learning by Asymmetric Image Weighting for Segmentation across Scanners. arXiv.org.

Vancouver

Cheplygina V, Opbroek AV, Ikram MA, Vernooij MW, Bruijne MD. Transfer Learning by Asymmetric Image Weighting for Segmentation across Scanners. arXiv.org. 2020.

Author

Cheplygina, Veronika ; Opbroek, Annegreet van ; Ikram, M. Arfan ; Vernooij, Meike W. ; Bruijne, Marleen de. / Transfer Learning by Asymmetric Image Weighting for Segmentation across Scanners. In: arXiv.org. 2020.

Bibtex

@article{b20b24ef94324bfc84b513804742d1e1,
title = "Transfer Learning by Asymmetric Image Weighting for Segmentation across Scanners",
abstract = " Supervised learning has been very successful for automatic segmentation of images from a single scanner. However, several papers report deteriorated performances when using classifiers trained on images from one scanner to segment images from other scanners. We propose a transfer learning classifier that adapts to differences between training and test images. This method uses a weighted ensemble of classifiers trained on individual images. The weight of each classifier is determined by the similarity between its training image and the test image. We examine three unsupervised similarity measures, which can be used in scenarios where no labeled data from a newly introduced scanner or scanning protocol is available. The measures are based on a divergence, a bag distance, and on estimating the labels with a clustering procedure. These measures are asymmetric. We study whether the asymmetry can improve classification. Out of the three similarity measures, the bag similarity measure is the most robust across different studies and achieves excellent results on four brain tissue segmentation datasets and three white matter lesion segmentation datasets, acquired at different centers and with different scanners and scanning protocols. We show that the asymmetry can indeed be informative, and that computing the similarity from the test image to the training images is more appropriate than the opposite direction. ",
keywords = "cs.CV, stat.ML",
author = "Veronika Cheplygina and Opbroek, {Annegreet van} and Ikram, {M. Arfan} and Vernooij, {Meike W.} and Bruijne, {Marleen de}",
year = "2020",
language = "English",
journal = "arXiv.org",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Transfer Learning by Asymmetric Image Weighting for Segmentation across Scanners

AU - Cheplygina, Veronika

AU - Opbroek, Annegreet van

AU - Ikram, M. Arfan

AU - Vernooij, Meike W.

AU - Bruijne, Marleen de

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Supervised learning has been very successful for automatic segmentation of images from a single scanner. However, several papers report deteriorated performances when using classifiers trained on images from one scanner to segment images from other scanners. We propose a transfer learning classifier that adapts to differences between training and test images. This method uses a weighted ensemble of classifiers trained on individual images. The weight of each classifier is determined by the similarity between its training image and the test image. We examine three unsupervised similarity measures, which can be used in scenarios where no labeled data from a newly introduced scanner or scanning protocol is available. The measures are based on a divergence, a bag distance, and on estimating the labels with a clustering procedure. These measures are asymmetric. We study whether the asymmetry can improve classification. Out of the three similarity measures, the bag similarity measure is the most robust across different studies and achieves excellent results on four brain tissue segmentation datasets and three white matter lesion segmentation datasets, acquired at different centers and with different scanners and scanning protocols. We show that the asymmetry can indeed be informative, and that computing the similarity from the test image to the training images is more appropriate than the opposite direction.

AB - Supervised learning has been very successful for automatic segmentation of images from a single scanner. However, several papers report deteriorated performances when using classifiers trained on images from one scanner to segment images from other scanners. We propose a transfer learning classifier that adapts to differences between training and test images. This method uses a weighted ensemble of classifiers trained on individual images. The weight of each classifier is determined by the similarity between its training image and the test image. We examine three unsupervised similarity measures, which can be used in scenarios where no labeled data from a newly introduced scanner or scanning protocol is available. The measures are based on a divergence, a bag distance, and on estimating the labels with a clustering procedure. These measures are asymmetric. We study whether the asymmetry can improve classification. Out of the three similarity measures, the bag similarity measure is the most robust across different studies and achieves excellent results on four brain tissue segmentation datasets and three white matter lesion segmentation datasets, acquired at different centers and with different scanners and scanning protocols. We show that the asymmetry can indeed be informative, and that computing the similarity from the test image to the training images is more appropriate than the opposite direction.

KW - cs.CV

KW - stat.ML

M3 - Journal article

JO - arXiv.org

JF - arXiv.org

ER -

ID: 208886301