The Situated and Bounded Rationality of International Courts: A Structuralist Approach to International Adjudicative Practices

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

The Situated and Bounded Rationality of International Courts: A Structuralist Approach to International Adjudicative Practices. / Caserta, Salvatore; Madsen, Mikael Rask.

In: Leiden Journal of International Law, Vol. 35, No. 4, 2022, p. 931-943.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Caserta, S & Madsen, MR 2022, 'The Situated and Bounded Rationality of International Courts: A Structuralist Approach to International Adjudicative Practices', Leiden Journal of International Law, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 931-943. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156522000486

APA

Caserta, S., & Madsen, M. R. (2022). The Situated and Bounded Rationality of International Courts: A Structuralist Approach to International Adjudicative Practices. Leiden Journal of International Law, 35(4), 931-943. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156522000486

Vancouver

Caserta S, Madsen MR. The Situated and Bounded Rationality of International Courts: A Structuralist Approach to International Adjudicative Practices. Leiden Journal of International Law. 2022;35(4):931-943. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156522000486

Author

Caserta, Salvatore ; Madsen, Mikael Rask. / The Situated and Bounded Rationality of International Courts: A Structuralist Approach to International Adjudicative Practices. In: Leiden Journal of International Law. 2022 ; Vol. 35, No. 4. pp. 931-943.

Bibtex

@article{217a5a68aabb4832a46b844c671b30da,
title = "The Situated and Bounded Rationality of International Courts:: A Structuralist Approach to International Adjudicative Practices",
abstract = "Understanding international judicial behaviour requires developing a perspective that considers both individual and collective action. On the one hand, individual judges are marked by their background and trajectory before international judicial appointment; on the other hand, when appointed to international courts they enter a particular social setting and group dynamic. The paper provides an interpretive, structural theory of judicial behaviour that allows to understand international judicial action and the resulting judicial institutional practices. The paper explains this double structuration of international judicial behaviour by first reconsidering and amending the notion of habitus originally developed by Pierre Bourdieu and secondly applying this idea to the practice of the Caribbean Court of Justice.",
author = "Salvatore Caserta and Madsen, {Mikael Rask}",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1017/S0922156522000486",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "931--943",
journal = "Leiden Journal of International Law",
issn = "0922-1565",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Situated and Bounded Rationality of International Courts:

T2 - A Structuralist Approach to International Adjudicative Practices

AU - Caserta, Salvatore

AU - Madsen, Mikael Rask

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Understanding international judicial behaviour requires developing a perspective that considers both individual and collective action. On the one hand, individual judges are marked by their background and trajectory before international judicial appointment; on the other hand, when appointed to international courts they enter a particular social setting and group dynamic. The paper provides an interpretive, structural theory of judicial behaviour that allows to understand international judicial action and the resulting judicial institutional practices. The paper explains this double structuration of international judicial behaviour by first reconsidering and amending the notion of habitus originally developed by Pierre Bourdieu and secondly applying this idea to the practice of the Caribbean Court of Justice.

AB - Understanding international judicial behaviour requires developing a perspective that considers both individual and collective action. On the one hand, individual judges are marked by their background and trajectory before international judicial appointment; on the other hand, when appointed to international courts they enter a particular social setting and group dynamic. The paper provides an interpretive, structural theory of judicial behaviour that allows to understand international judicial action and the resulting judicial institutional practices. The paper explains this double structuration of international judicial behaviour by first reconsidering and amending the notion of habitus originally developed by Pierre Bourdieu and secondly applying this idea to the practice of the Caribbean Court of Justice.

U2 - 10.1017/S0922156522000486

DO - 10.1017/S0922156522000486

M3 - Journal article

VL - 35

SP - 931

EP - 943

JO - Leiden Journal of International Law

JF - Leiden Journal of International Law

SN - 0922-1565

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 310229439