The optimal cut-off value in fit-based colorectal cancer screening: An observational study

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Documents

  • Sisse Helle Njor
  • Berit Andersen
  • Lennart Friis-Hansen
  • Niels de Haas
  • Dorte Linnemann
  • Henrik Nørgaard
  • Roikjær, Ole
  • Bo Søndergaard
  • Morten Rasmussen

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs using fecal immunochemical test (FIT) have to choose a cut-off value to decide which citizens to recall for colonoscopy. The evidence on the optimal cut-off value is sparse and based on studies with a low number of cancer cases.

METHODS: This observational study used data from the Danish Colorectal Cancer Screening Database. Sensitivity and specificity were estimated for various cut-off values based on a large number of cancers. Traditionally optimal cut-off values are found by weighting sensitivity and specificity equally. As this might result in too many unnecessary colonoscopies we also provide optimal cut-off values for different weighting of sensitivity and specificity/number of needed colonoscopies to detect one cancer.

RESULTS: Weighting sensitivity and specificity equally gives an optimal cut-off value of 45 ng Hb/ml. This, however, means making 24 colonoscopies to detect one cancer. Weighting sensitivity lower and for example, aiming at making about 16 colonoscopies to detect one cancer, gives an optimal cut-off value of 125 ng Hb/ml.

CONCLUSIONS: The optimal cut-off value in an FIT population-based screening program is 45 ng Hb/ml, when as traditionally sensitivity and specificity are weighted equally. If, however, 24 colonoscopies needed to detect one cancer is too huge a burden on the health care system and the participants, 80, 125, 175, and 350 ng Hb/ml are optimal cut-off values when only 19/16/14/10 colonoscopies are accepted to find one cancer.

Original languageEnglish
JournalCancer Medicine
Volume10
Issue number5
Pages (from-to)1872-1879
Number of pages8
ISSN2045-7634
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2021

Number of downloads are based on statistics from Google Scholar and www.ku.dk


No data available

ID: 258341586