The flexibility of early memories: Limited reevaluation of action steps in 2-year-old infants

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

The flexibility of early memories : Limited reevaluation of action steps in 2-year-old infants. / Liszkai-Peres, Krisztina; Kampis, Dora; Király, Ildikó.

In: Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, Vol. 203, 105046, 03.2021.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Liszkai-Peres, K, Kampis, D & Király, I 2021, 'The flexibility of early memories: Limited reevaluation of action steps in 2-year-old infants', Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, vol. 203, 105046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2020.105046

APA

Liszkai-Peres, K., Kampis, D., & Király, I. (2021). The flexibility of early memories: Limited reevaluation of action steps in 2-year-old infants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 203, [105046]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2020.105046

Vancouver

Liszkai-Peres K, Kampis D, Király I. The flexibility of early memories: Limited reevaluation of action steps in 2-year-old infants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 2021 Mar;203. 105046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2020.105046

Author

Liszkai-Peres, Krisztina ; Kampis, Dora ; Király, Ildikó. / The flexibility of early memories : Limited reevaluation of action steps in 2-year-old infants. In: Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 2021 ; Vol. 203.

Bibtex

@article{b8f42b62488646139fb46ba406d7e0e3,
title = "The flexibility of early memories: Limited reevaluation of action steps in 2-year-old infants",
abstract = "This study investigated the flexibility of 2-year-old infants{\textquoteright} retrieval and reenactment processes. In a delayed imitation paradigm, children were exposed to a constraint change (implemented by the distance of a target object) affecting the relevance of using a tool to obtain a goal (reach the object). In Experiment 1, during demonstration in the first session the tool was either relevant or irrelevant for reaching the goal, and 1 week later it either lost or gained its relevance, respectively. We found that when the tool became unnecessary (relevant to irrelevant change), children used it somewhat less than before and used it less compared with when the tool's relevance remained the same (relevant to relevant, no change). When the tool became necessary after a constraint change (irrelevant to relevant change), children used the tool more than before, but not as much as in the Relevant–Relevant control condition. In Experiment 2, the timing of the constraint change (immediate or delayed) was varied in a modified version of the Irrelevant–Relevant condition, where practice before the constraint change was omitted. Children were not significantly more flexible in the immediate condition than in the delayed condition, and comparisons with Experiment 1 showed that performance did not change if we omitted the practice before the change. These results indicate that although 2-year-olds show considerable mnemonic performance, they face difficulties in adapting to constraint changes. We propose that this inflexibility may stem from infants{\textquoteright} inability to revise their evaluations formed in previous events due to their immature episodic memory capacities.",
keywords = "Action relevance, Constraint change, Delayed imitation, Episodic memory, Event memory, Memory development, Updating",
author = "Krisztina Liszkai-Peres and Dora Kampis and Ildik{\'o} Kir{\'a}ly",
year = "2021",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1016/j.jecp.2020.105046",
language = "English",
volume = "203",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Child Psychology",
issn = "0022-0965",
publisher = "Academic Press",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The flexibility of early memories

T2 - Limited reevaluation of action steps in 2-year-old infants

AU - Liszkai-Peres, Krisztina

AU - Kampis, Dora

AU - Király, Ildikó

PY - 2021/3

Y1 - 2021/3

N2 - This study investigated the flexibility of 2-year-old infants’ retrieval and reenactment processes. In a delayed imitation paradigm, children were exposed to a constraint change (implemented by the distance of a target object) affecting the relevance of using a tool to obtain a goal (reach the object). In Experiment 1, during demonstration in the first session the tool was either relevant or irrelevant for reaching the goal, and 1 week later it either lost or gained its relevance, respectively. We found that when the tool became unnecessary (relevant to irrelevant change), children used it somewhat less than before and used it less compared with when the tool's relevance remained the same (relevant to relevant, no change). When the tool became necessary after a constraint change (irrelevant to relevant change), children used the tool more than before, but not as much as in the Relevant–Relevant control condition. In Experiment 2, the timing of the constraint change (immediate or delayed) was varied in a modified version of the Irrelevant–Relevant condition, where practice before the constraint change was omitted. Children were not significantly more flexible in the immediate condition than in the delayed condition, and comparisons with Experiment 1 showed that performance did not change if we omitted the practice before the change. These results indicate that although 2-year-olds show considerable mnemonic performance, they face difficulties in adapting to constraint changes. We propose that this inflexibility may stem from infants’ inability to revise their evaluations formed in previous events due to their immature episodic memory capacities.

AB - This study investigated the flexibility of 2-year-old infants’ retrieval and reenactment processes. In a delayed imitation paradigm, children were exposed to a constraint change (implemented by the distance of a target object) affecting the relevance of using a tool to obtain a goal (reach the object). In Experiment 1, during demonstration in the first session the tool was either relevant or irrelevant for reaching the goal, and 1 week later it either lost or gained its relevance, respectively. We found that when the tool became unnecessary (relevant to irrelevant change), children used it somewhat less than before and used it less compared with when the tool's relevance remained the same (relevant to relevant, no change). When the tool became necessary after a constraint change (irrelevant to relevant change), children used the tool more than before, but not as much as in the Relevant–Relevant control condition. In Experiment 2, the timing of the constraint change (immediate or delayed) was varied in a modified version of the Irrelevant–Relevant condition, where practice before the constraint change was omitted. Children were not significantly more flexible in the immediate condition than in the delayed condition, and comparisons with Experiment 1 showed that performance did not change if we omitted the practice before the change. These results indicate that although 2-year-olds show considerable mnemonic performance, they face difficulties in adapting to constraint changes. We propose that this inflexibility may stem from infants’ inability to revise their evaluations formed in previous events due to their immature episodic memory capacities.

KW - Action relevance

KW - Constraint change

KW - Delayed imitation

KW - Episodic memory

KW - Event memory

KW - Memory development

KW - Updating

U2 - 10.1016/j.jecp.2020.105046

DO - 10.1016/j.jecp.2020.105046

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 33285338

AN - SCOPUS:85097374972

VL - 203

JO - Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

JF - Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

SN - 0022-0965

M1 - 105046

ER -

ID: 255398345