Network Agenda Setting, Partisan Selective Exposure, and Opinion Repertoire: The Effects of Pro- and Counter-Attitudinal Media in Hong Kong

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

Network Agenda Setting, Partisan Selective Exposure, and Opinion Repertoire: The Effects of Pro- and Counter-Attitudinal Media in Hong Kong. / Chen, Hsuan-Ting; Guo, Lei; Su, Chris Chao.

In: Journal of Communication, Vol. 70, No. 1, 20.02.2020, p. 35-59.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Chen, H-T, Guo, L & Su, CC 2020, 'Network Agenda Setting, Partisan Selective Exposure, and Opinion Repertoire: The Effects of Pro- and Counter-Attitudinal Media in Hong Kong', Journal of Communication, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 35-59. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqz042

APA

Chen, H-T., Guo, L., & Su, C. C. (2020). Network Agenda Setting, Partisan Selective Exposure, and Opinion Repertoire: The Effects of Pro- and Counter-Attitudinal Media in Hong Kong. Journal of Communication, 70(1), 35-59. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqz042

Vancouver

Chen H-T, Guo L, Su CC. Network Agenda Setting, Partisan Selective Exposure, and Opinion Repertoire: The Effects of Pro- and Counter-Attitudinal Media in Hong Kong. Journal of Communication. 2020 Feb 20;70(1):35-59. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqz042

Author

Chen, Hsuan-Ting ; Guo, Lei ; Su, Chris Chao. / Network Agenda Setting, Partisan Selective Exposure, and Opinion Repertoire: The Effects of Pro- and Counter-Attitudinal Media in Hong Kong. In: Journal of Communication. 2020 ; Vol. 70, No. 1. pp. 35-59.

Bibtex

@article{fd46f7e5455a43c5b1943544889cf07d,
title = "Network Agenda Setting, Partisan Selective Exposure, and Opinion Repertoire: The Effects of Pro- and Counter-Attitudinal Media in Hong Kong",
abstract = "sing data from a content analysis of partisan media and a public opinion survey administered in Hong Kong, this study incorporates selective exposure and deliberation literature into the network agenda-setting (NAS) model to test media effects on people{\textquoteright}s perception of the relationship between Hong Kong and mainland China. This study advances the NAS literature by examining the effects of different media types (i.e., pro- and counter-attitudinal media), considering the patterns of media consumption (i.e., engagement in selective exposure or not), and differentiating between the NAS effects on one{\textquoteright}s own opinion repertoire and the oppositional opinion repertoire (i.e., thoughts about how oppositional others perceive the issue). The findings of the study demonstrate that the network agenda of pro-attitudinal media was significantly correlated with both one{\textquoteright}s own and oppositional opinion repertoires for those who engaged in partisan selective exposure. For those who did not engage in partisan selective exposure, the network agenda of counter-attitudinal media was significantly related to the oppositional opinion repertoire and the findings for one{\textquoteright}s own opinion repertoire were mixed.",
author = "Hsuan-Ting Chen and Lei Guo and Su, {Chris Chao}",
year = "2020",
month = feb,
day = "20",
doi = "10.1093/joc/jqz042",
language = "English",
volume = "70",
pages = "35--59",
journal = "Journal of Communication",
issn = "0021-9916",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Network Agenda Setting, Partisan Selective Exposure, and Opinion Repertoire: The Effects of Pro- and Counter-Attitudinal Media in Hong Kong

AU - Chen, Hsuan-Ting

AU - Guo, Lei

AU - Su, Chris Chao

PY - 2020/2/20

Y1 - 2020/2/20

N2 - sing data from a content analysis of partisan media and a public opinion survey administered in Hong Kong, this study incorporates selective exposure and deliberation literature into the network agenda-setting (NAS) model to test media effects on people’s perception of the relationship between Hong Kong and mainland China. This study advances the NAS literature by examining the effects of different media types (i.e., pro- and counter-attitudinal media), considering the patterns of media consumption (i.e., engagement in selective exposure or not), and differentiating between the NAS effects on one’s own opinion repertoire and the oppositional opinion repertoire (i.e., thoughts about how oppositional others perceive the issue). The findings of the study demonstrate that the network agenda of pro-attitudinal media was significantly correlated with both one’s own and oppositional opinion repertoires for those who engaged in partisan selective exposure. For those who did not engage in partisan selective exposure, the network agenda of counter-attitudinal media was significantly related to the oppositional opinion repertoire and the findings for one’s own opinion repertoire were mixed.

AB - sing data from a content analysis of partisan media and a public opinion survey administered in Hong Kong, this study incorporates selective exposure and deliberation literature into the network agenda-setting (NAS) model to test media effects on people’s perception of the relationship between Hong Kong and mainland China. This study advances the NAS literature by examining the effects of different media types (i.e., pro- and counter-attitudinal media), considering the patterns of media consumption (i.e., engagement in selective exposure or not), and differentiating between the NAS effects on one’s own opinion repertoire and the oppositional opinion repertoire (i.e., thoughts about how oppositional others perceive the issue). The findings of the study demonstrate that the network agenda of pro-attitudinal media was significantly correlated with both one’s own and oppositional opinion repertoires for those who engaged in partisan selective exposure. For those who did not engage in partisan selective exposure, the network agenda of counter-attitudinal media was significantly related to the oppositional opinion repertoire and the findings for one’s own opinion repertoire were mixed.

U2 - 10.1093/joc/jqz042

DO - 10.1093/joc/jqz042

M3 - Journal article

VL - 70

SP - 35

EP - 59

JO - Journal of Communication

JF - Journal of Communication

SN - 0021-9916

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 236558250