Implementing accountability for reasonableness framework at district level in Tanzania: a realist evaluation

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

Implementing accountability for reasonableness framework at district level in Tanzania : a realist evaluation. / Maluka, Stephen; Kamuzora, Peter; SanSebastián, Miguel; Byskov, Jens; Ndawi, Benedict; Olsen, Øystein E.; Hurtig, Anna-Karin.

In: Implementation Science, Vol. 6, No. 11, 2011, p. 11.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Maluka, S, Kamuzora, P, SanSebastián, M, Byskov, J, Ndawi, B, Olsen, ØE & Hurtig, A-K 2011, 'Implementing accountability for reasonableness framework at district level in Tanzania: a realist evaluation', Implementation Science, vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-11

APA

Maluka, S., Kamuzora, P., SanSebastián, M., Byskov, J., Ndawi, B., Olsen, Ø. E., & Hurtig, A-K. (2011). Implementing accountability for reasonableness framework at district level in Tanzania: a realist evaluation. Implementation Science, 6(11), 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-11

Vancouver

Maluka S, Kamuzora P, SanSebastián M, Byskov J, Ndawi B, Olsen ØE et al. Implementing accountability for reasonableness framework at district level in Tanzania: a realist evaluation. Implementation Science. 2011;6(11):11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-6-11

Author

Maluka, Stephen ; Kamuzora, Peter ; SanSebastián, Miguel ; Byskov, Jens ; Ndawi, Benedict ; Olsen, Øystein E. ; Hurtig, Anna-Karin. / Implementing accountability for reasonableness framework at district level in Tanzania : a realist evaluation. In: Implementation Science. 2011 ; Vol. 6, No. 11. pp. 11.

Bibtex

@article{022d7a576f3e4a87ae710db0b68165f7,
title = "Implementing accountability for reasonableness framework at district level in Tanzania: a realist evaluation",
abstract = "Despite the growing importance of the Accountability for Reasonableness (A4R) framework in priority setting worldwide, there is still an inadequate understanding of the processes and mechanisms underlying its influence on legitimacy and fairness, as conceived and reflected in service management processes and outcomes. As a result, the ability to draw scientifically sound lessons for the application of the framework to services and interventions is limited. This paper evaluates the experiences of implementing the A4R approach in Mbarali District, Tanzania, in order to find out how the innovation was shaped, enabled, and constrained by the interaction between contexts, mechanisms and outcomes.",
keywords = "Health Priorities, Health Resources, Humans, Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care), Program Development, Regional Health Planning, Social Responsibility, Tanzania",
author = "Stephen Maluka and Peter Kamuzora and Miguel SanSebasti{\'a}n and Jens Byskov and Benedict Ndawi and Olsen, {{\O}ystein E.} and Anna-Karin Hurtig",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1186/1748-5908-6-11",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "11",
journal = "Implementation Science",
issn = "1748-5908",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "11",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implementing accountability for reasonableness framework at district level in Tanzania

T2 - a realist evaluation

AU - Maluka, Stephen

AU - Kamuzora, Peter

AU - SanSebastián, Miguel

AU - Byskov, Jens

AU - Ndawi, Benedict

AU - Olsen, Øystein E.

AU - Hurtig, Anna-Karin

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Despite the growing importance of the Accountability for Reasonableness (A4R) framework in priority setting worldwide, there is still an inadequate understanding of the processes and mechanisms underlying its influence on legitimacy and fairness, as conceived and reflected in service management processes and outcomes. As a result, the ability to draw scientifically sound lessons for the application of the framework to services and interventions is limited. This paper evaluates the experiences of implementing the A4R approach in Mbarali District, Tanzania, in order to find out how the innovation was shaped, enabled, and constrained by the interaction between contexts, mechanisms and outcomes.

AB - Despite the growing importance of the Accountability for Reasonableness (A4R) framework in priority setting worldwide, there is still an inadequate understanding of the processes and mechanisms underlying its influence on legitimacy and fairness, as conceived and reflected in service management processes and outcomes. As a result, the ability to draw scientifically sound lessons for the application of the framework to services and interventions is limited. This paper evaluates the experiences of implementing the A4R approach in Mbarali District, Tanzania, in order to find out how the innovation was shaped, enabled, and constrained by the interaction between contexts, mechanisms and outcomes.

KW - Health Priorities

KW - Health Resources

KW - Humans

KW - Outcome and Process Assessment (Health Care)

KW - Program Development

KW - Regional Health Planning

KW - Social Responsibility

KW - Tanzania

U2 - 10.1186/1748-5908-6-11

DO - 10.1186/1748-5908-6-11

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 21310021

VL - 6

SP - 11

JO - Implementation Science

JF - Implementation Science

SN - 1748-5908

IS - 11

ER -

ID: 33463160