From diversity to conviviality: intra-EU mobility and international migration to Denmark in times of economic recession

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

From diversity to conviviality: intra-EU mobility and international migration to Denmark in times of economic recession. / Duru, Deniz Neriman; Trenz, Hans-Jörg.

In: Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, Vol. 43, No. 4, 2017, p. 613-632.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Duru, DN & Trenz, H-J 2017, 'From diversity to conviviality: intra-EU mobility and international migration to Denmark in times of economic recession', Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 613-632. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2016.1249049

APA

Duru, D. N., & Trenz, H-J. (2017). From diversity to conviviality: intra-EU mobility and international migration to Denmark in times of economic recession. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 43(4), 613-632. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2016.1249049

Vancouver

Duru DN, Trenz H-J. From diversity to conviviality: intra-EU mobility and international migration to Denmark in times of economic recession. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. 2017;43(4):613-632. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2016.1249049

Author

Duru, Deniz Neriman ; Trenz, Hans-Jörg. / From diversity to conviviality: intra-EU mobility and international migration to Denmark in times of economic recession. In: Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. 2017 ; Vol. 43, No. 4. pp. 613-632.

Bibtex

@article{c087501706444647987858c2ade1df45,
title = "From diversity to conviviality: intra-EU mobility and international migration to Denmark in times of economic recession",
abstract = "This article explores differences among EU and non-EU migrants in accommodating to the Danish flexicurity labour and welfare regime during times of economic crisis. We build our findings on a quantitative survey followed by semi-structured qualitative interviews conducted with EU and non-EU migrants who moved to Denmark during the recession period (2008–2013). We argue that the lack of multicultural policies triggers individualised strategies of accommodation rather than ethnic or national group base integration, favouring a more homogenous group of high-skilled and educated group of workers and students of postgraduate/higher education, whom we describe as a {\textquoteleft}flexicurity diversity group{\textquoteright}. Through patterns of conviviality, individual socialisation is based here on common interests, needs and lifestyles and not on pre-defined ethnic and/or cultural traits. The transition from diversity to conviviality that is initiated by this group remains however incomplete in light of the unequal opportunities and the differentiated scheme of rights that apply to EU and non-EU immigrants. Danish flexicurity has thus not had the desired inclusive effects but discriminates in terms of facilitating easy access to the labour market for all, and {\textquoteleft}securing{\textquoteright} social benefits and offering rights and protection only to the privileged group of EU migrants.",
keywords = "Faculty of Humanities, Multiculturalism, conviviality, flexicurity diversity, crisis migration, social media",
author = "Duru, {Deniz Neriman} and Hans-J{\"o}rg Trenz",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1080/1369183X.2016.1249049",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "613--632",
journal = "Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies",
issn = "1369-183X",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - From diversity to conviviality: intra-EU mobility and international migration to Denmark in times of economic recession

AU - Duru, Deniz Neriman

AU - Trenz, Hans-Jörg

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - This article explores differences among EU and non-EU migrants in accommodating to the Danish flexicurity labour and welfare regime during times of economic crisis. We build our findings on a quantitative survey followed by semi-structured qualitative interviews conducted with EU and non-EU migrants who moved to Denmark during the recession period (2008–2013). We argue that the lack of multicultural policies triggers individualised strategies of accommodation rather than ethnic or national group base integration, favouring a more homogenous group of high-skilled and educated group of workers and students of postgraduate/higher education, whom we describe as a ‘flexicurity diversity group’. Through patterns of conviviality, individual socialisation is based here on common interests, needs and lifestyles and not on pre-defined ethnic and/or cultural traits. The transition from diversity to conviviality that is initiated by this group remains however incomplete in light of the unequal opportunities and the differentiated scheme of rights that apply to EU and non-EU immigrants. Danish flexicurity has thus not had the desired inclusive effects but discriminates in terms of facilitating easy access to the labour market for all, and ‘securing’ social benefits and offering rights and protection only to the privileged group of EU migrants.

AB - This article explores differences among EU and non-EU migrants in accommodating to the Danish flexicurity labour and welfare regime during times of economic crisis. We build our findings on a quantitative survey followed by semi-structured qualitative interviews conducted with EU and non-EU migrants who moved to Denmark during the recession period (2008–2013). We argue that the lack of multicultural policies triggers individualised strategies of accommodation rather than ethnic or national group base integration, favouring a more homogenous group of high-skilled and educated group of workers and students of postgraduate/higher education, whom we describe as a ‘flexicurity diversity group’. Through patterns of conviviality, individual socialisation is based here on common interests, needs and lifestyles and not on pre-defined ethnic and/or cultural traits. The transition from diversity to conviviality that is initiated by this group remains however incomplete in light of the unequal opportunities and the differentiated scheme of rights that apply to EU and non-EU immigrants. Danish flexicurity has thus not had the desired inclusive effects but discriminates in terms of facilitating easy access to the labour market for all, and ‘securing’ social benefits and offering rights and protection only to the privileged group of EU migrants.

KW - Faculty of Humanities

KW - Multiculturalism

KW - conviviality

KW - flexicurity diversity

KW - crisis migration

KW - social media

U2 - 10.1080/1369183X.2016.1249049

DO - 10.1080/1369183X.2016.1249049

M3 - Journal article

VL - 43

SP - 613

EP - 632

JO - Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies

JF - Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies

SN - 1369-183X

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 167881468