Freedom in the External Relation of All Human Beings: On Kant’s Cosmopolitanism

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Freedom in the External Relation of All Human Beings : On Kant’s Cosmopolitanism. / Rostbøll, Christian F.

In: Kantian Review, Vol. 25, No. 2, 30.04.2020, p. 243-265.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Rostbøll, CF 2020, 'Freedom in the External Relation of All Human Beings: On Kant’s Cosmopolitanism', Kantian Review, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 243-265. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1369415420000060

APA

Rostbøll, C. F. (2020). Freedom in the External Relation of All Human Beings: On Kant’s Cosmopolitanism. Kantian Review, 25(2), 243-265. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1369415420000060

Vancouver

Rostbøll CF. Freedom in the External Relation of All Human Beings: On Kant’s Cosmopolitanism. Kantian Review. 2020 Apr 30;25(2):243-265. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1369415420000060

Author

Rostbøll, Christian F. / Freedom in the External Relation of All Human Beings : On Kant’s Cosmopolitanism. In: Kantian Review. 2020 ; Vol. 25, No. 2. pp. 243-265.

Bibtex

@article{299f55a6dae44ce5879cf3e99612b0f6,
title = "Freedom in the External Relation of All Human Beings: On Kant{\textquoteright}s Cosmopolitanism",
abstract = "An influential interpretation of Kant{\textquoteright}s Doctrine of Right suggests that the relationship between public Right and freedom is constitutive rather than instrumental. The focus has been domestic Right and members{\textquoteright} relation to their own state and has resulted in a statist bias, which has not adequately dealt with the fact that Kant regards public Right as a system composed of three levels – domestic, international, and cosmopolitan Right. This article suggests that the constitutive relationship is between all levels of Right, on the one hand, and {\textquoteleft}freedom in the external relation{\textquoteright} of all human beings, on the other hand.",
author = "Rostb{\o}ll, {Christian F.}",
year = "2020",
month = apr,
day = "30",
doi = "10.1017/S1369415420000060",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "243--265",
journal = "Kantian Review",
issn = "1369-4154",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Freedom in the External Relation of All Human Beings

T2 - On Kant’s Cosmopolitanism

AU - Rostbøll, Christian F.

PY - 2020/4/30

Y1 - 2020/4/30

N2 - An influential interpretation of Kant’s Doctrine of Right suggests that the relationship between public Right and freedom is constitutive rather than instrumental. The focus has been domestic Right and members’ relation to their own state and has resulted in a statist bias, which has not adequately dealt with the fact that Kant regards public Right as a system composed of three levels – domestic, international, and cosmopolitan Right. This article suggests that the constitutive relationship is between all levels of Right, on the one hand, and ‘freedom in the external relation’ of all human beings, on the other hand.

AB - An influential interpretation of Kant’s Doctrine of Right suggests that the relationship between public Right and freedom is constitutive rather than instrumental. The focus has been domestic Right and members’ relation to their own state and has resulted in a statist bias, which has not adequately dealt with the fact that Kant regards public Right as a system composed of three levels – domestic, international, and cosmopolitan Right. This article suggests that the constitutive relationship is between all levels of Right, on the one hand, and ‘freedom in the external relation’ of all human beings, on the other hand.

U2 - 10.1017/S1369415420000060

DO - 10.1017/S1369415420000060

M3 - Journal article

VL - 25

SP - 243

EP - 265

JO - Kantian Review

JF - Kantian Review

SN - 1369-4154

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 240318382