Disruption of chromatin folding domains by somatic genomic rearrangements in human cancer

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Documents

  • Kadir C. Akdemir
  • Victoria T. Le
  • Sahaana Chandran
  • Yilong Li
  • Roel G. Verhaak
  • Rameen Beroukhim
  • Peter J. Campbell
  • Lynda Chin
  • Jesse R. Dixon
  • P. Andrew Futreal
  • Kadir C. Akdemir
  • Eva G. Alvarez
  • Adrian Baez-Ortega
  • Rameen Beroukhim
  • Paul C. Boutros
  • David D.L. Bowtell
  • Benedikt Brors
  • Kathleen H. Burns
  • Peter J. Campbell
  • Kin Chan
  • Ken Chen
  • Isidro Cortés-Ciriano
  • Ana Dueso-Barroso
  • Andrew J. Dunford
  • Paul A. Edwards
  • Xavier Estivill
  • Dariush Etemadmoghadam
  • Lars Feuerbach
  • J. Lynn Fink
  • Milana Frenkel-Morgenstern
  • Dale W. Garsed
  • Mark Gerstein
  • Dmitry A. Gordenin
  • David Haan
  • James E. Haber
  • Julian M. Hess
  • Barbara Hutter
  • Marcin Imielinski
  • David T.W. Jones
  • Young Seok Ju
  • Marat D. Kazanov
  • Leszek J. Klimczak
  • Youngil Koh
  • Jan O. Korbel
  • Kiran Kumar
  • Eunjung Alice Lee
  • Jake June Koo Lee
  • Yilong Li
  • Nikos Sidiropoulos
  • Weischenfeldt, Joachim Lütken
  • PCAWG Structural Variation Working Group
  • PCAWG Consortium

Chromatin is folded into successive layers to organize linear DNA. Genes within the same topologically associating domains (TADs) demonstrate similar expression and histone-modification profiles, and boundaries separating different domains have important roles in reinforcing the stability of these features. Indeed, domain disruptions in human cancers can lead to misregulation of gene expression. However, the frequency of domain disruptions in human cancers remains unclear. Here, as part of the Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes (PCAWG) Consortium of the International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), which aggregated whole-genome sequencing data from 2,658 cancers across 38 tumor types, we analyzed 288,457 somatic structural variations (SVs) to understand the distributions and effects of SVs across TADs. Notably, SVs can lead to the fusion of discrete TADs, and complex rearrangements markedly change chromatin folding maps in the cancer genomes. Notably, only 14% of the boundary deletions resulted in a change in expression in nearby genes of more than twofold.

Original languageEnglish
JournalNature Genetics
Pages (from-to)294-305
ISSN1061-4036
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Number of downloads are based on statistics from Google Scholar and www.ku.dk


No data available

ID: 236667368