Comparing major and mild cognitive impairment risks in older type-2 diabetic patients: a Danish register-based study on dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors vs. glucagon-like peptide-1 analogues

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Comparing major and mild cognitive impairment risks in older type-2 diabetic patients : a Danish register-based study on dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors vs. glucagon-like peptide-1 analogues. / Battini, Vera; Barbieri, Maria Antonietta; Carnovale, Carla; Spina, Edoardo; Clementi, Emilio; Sessa, Maurizio.

In: Journal of Neurology, 2024.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Battini, V, Barbieri, MA, Carnovale, C, Spina, E, Clementi, E & Sessa, M 2024, 'Comparing major and mild cognitive impairment risks in older type-2 diabetic patients: a Danish register-based study on dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors vs. glucagon-like peptide-1 analogues', Journal of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-024-12300-9

APA

Battini, V., Barbieri, M. A., Carnovale, C., Spina, E., Clementi, E., & Sessa, M. (2024). Comparing major and mild cognitive impairment risks in older type-2 diabetic patients: a Danish register-based study on dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors vs. glucagon-like peptide-1 analogues. Journal of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-024-12300-9

Vancouver

Battini V, Barbieri MA, Carnovale C, Spina E, Clementi E, Sessa M. Comparing major and mild cognitive impairment risks in older type-2 diabetic patients: a Danish register-based study on dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors vs. glucagon-like peptide-1 analogues. Journal of Neurology. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-024-12300-9

Author

Battini, Vera ; Barbieri, Maria Antonietta ; Carnovale, Carla ; Spina, Edoardo ; Clementi, Emilio ; Sessa, Maurizio. / Comparing major and mild cognitive impairment risks in older type-2 diabetic patients : a Danish register-based study on dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors vs. glucagon-like peptide-1 analogues. In: Journal of Neurology. 2024.

Bibtex

@article{023fb0419d0e4dc5aceaf8be35a3eabc,
title = "Comparing major and mild cognitive impairment risks in older type-2 diabetic patients: a Danish register-based study on dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors vs. glucagon-like peptide-1 analogues",
abstract = "INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of major and mild cognitive impairment (CI) in type-2 diabetes older patients is 15-25% and 30-60%, respectively, thus affecting quality of life and health outcomes. There is, therefore, the need of head-to-head studies aiming at identifying the optimal treatment for individuals with type-2 diabetes at increased risk of mild and major CI. This study focuses on the risk of developing mild and major CI in Danish patients treated with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 analogues (GLP-1a) using administrative and healthcare registers.METHODS: An active comparator design with a 3-year follow-up period was used. The main outcome was the hospital admission with a diagnosis of mild CI or major CI. Multivariate Cox Regression analysis was performed using the high-dimensional propensity score to obtain adjusted Hazard Ratio (HR) estimates. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and marginal structured model were used to calculate risk differences while accounting for the variations of confounders throughout the follow-up period.RESULTS: Our results show a significant higher risk of major CI between DPP-4i and GLP-1a in unadjusted [HR (95% CI) = 3.13 (2.45-4.00), p < 0.001] and adjusted analyses [HR (95% CI) = 1.58 (1.22-2.06), p = 0.001]. No statistically significant differences were observed for mild CI. IPTW resulted stable throughout the follow-up period. Marginal structure modeling (β (95% CI) = 0.022 (0.020-0.024), p < 0.001) resulted in a higher risk of major CI for DPP-4i when compared to GLP-1a.DISCUSSION: DPP-4i was associated with an increased risk of developing major CI when compared to GLP-1a among older individuals with type-2 diabetes.",
author = "Vera Battini and Barbieri, {Maria Antonietta} and Carla Carnovale and Edoardo Spina and Emilio Clementi and Maurizio Sessa",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2024. The Author(s).",
year = "2024",
doi = "10.1007/s00415-024-12300-9",
language = "English",
journal = "Deutsche Zeitschrift fur Nervenheilkunde",
issn = "0939-1517",
publisher = "Springer Medizin",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing major and mild cognitive impairment risks in older type-2 diabetic patients

T2 - a Danish register-based study on dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors vs. glucagon-like peptide-1 analogues

AU - Battini, Vera

AU - Barbieri, Maria Antonietta

AU - Carnovale, Carla

AU - Spina, Edoardo

AU - Clementi, Emilio

AU - Sessa, Maurizio

N1 - © 2024. The Author(s).

PY - 2024

Y1 - 2024

N2 - INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of major and mild cognitive impairment (CI) in type-2 diabetes older patients is 15-25% and 30-60%, respectively, thus affecting quality of life and health outcomes. There is, therefore, the need of head-to-head studies aiming at identifying the optimal treatment for individuals with type-2 diabetes at increased risk of mild and major CI. This study focuses on the risk of developing mild and major CI in Danish patients treated with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 analogues (GLP-1a) using administrative and healthcare registers.METHODS: An active comparator design with a 3-year follow-up period was used. The main outcome was the hospital admission with a diagnosis of mild CI or major CI. Multivariate Cox Regression analysis was performed using the high-dimensional propensity score to obtain adjusted Hazard Ratio (HR) estimates. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and marginal structured model were used to calculate risk differences while accounting for the variations of confounders throughout the follow-up period.RESULTS: Our results show a significant higher risk of major CI between DPP-4i and GLP-1a in unadjusted [HR (95% CI) = 3.13 (2.45-4.00), p < 0.001] and adjusted analyses [HR (95% CI) = 1.58 (1.22-2.06), p = 0.001]. No statistically significant differences were observed for mild CI. IPTW resulted stable throughout the follow-up period. Marginal structure modeling (β (95% CI) = 0.022 (0.020-0.024), p < 0.001) resulted in a higher risk of major CI for DPP-4i when compared to GLP-1a.DISCUSSION: DPP-4i was associated with an increased risk of developing major CI when compared to GLP-1a among older individuals with type-2 diabetes.

AB - INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of major and mild cognitive impairment (CI) in type-2 diabetes older patients is 15-25% and 30-60%, respectively, thus affecting quality of life and health outcomes. There is, therefore, the need of head-to-head studies aiming at identifying the optimal treatment for individuals with type-2 diabetes at increased risk of mild and major CI. This study focuses on the risk of developing mild and major CI in Danish patients treated with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 analogues (GLP-1a) using administrative and healthcare registers.METHODS: An active comparator design with a 3-year follow-up period was used. The main outcome was the hospital admission with a diagnosis of mild CI or major CI. Multivariate Cox Regression analysis was performed using the high-dimensional propensity score to obtain adjusted Hazard Ratio (HR) estimates. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and marginal structured model were used to calculate risk differences while accounting for the variations of confounders throughout the follow-up period.RESULTS: Our results show a significant higher risk of major CI between DPP-4i and GLP-1a in unadjusted [HR (95% CI) = 3.13 (2.45-4.00), p < 0.001] and adjusted analyses [HR (95% CI) = 1.58 (1.22-2.06), p = 0.001]. No statistically significant differences were observed for mild CI. IPTW resulted stable throughout the follow-up period. Marginal structure modeling (β (95% CI) = 0.022 (0.020-0.024), p < 0.001) resulted in a higher risk of major CI for DPP-4i when compared to GLP-1a.DISCUSSION: DPP-4i was associated with an increased risk of developing major CI when compared to GLP-1a among older individuals with type-2 diabetes.

U2 - 10.1007/s00415-024-12300-9

DO - 10.1007/s00415-024-12300-9

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 38517522

JO - Deutsche Zeitschrift fur Nervenheilkunde

JF - Deutsche Zeitschrift fur Nervenheilkunde

SN - 0939-1517

ER -

ID: 386368427