Changing Rural Paradigms: Rural Ethnology between State Interest and Local Activism

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Changing Rural Paradigms : Rural Ethnology between State Interest and Local Activism. / Høst, Jeppe Engset.

In: Ethnologia Scandinavica, 2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Høst, JE 2016, 'Changing Rural Paradigms: Rural Ethnology between State Interest and Local Activism', Ethnologia Scandinavica.

APA

Høst, J. E. (2016). Changing Rural Paradigms: Rural Ethnology between State Interest and Local Activism. Ethnologia Scandinavica.

Vancouver

Høst JE. Changing Rural Paradigms: Rural Ethnology between State Interest and Local Activism. Ethnologia Scandinavica. 2016.

Author

Høst, Jeppe Engset. / Changing Rural Paradigms : Rural Ethnology between State Interest and Local Activism. In: Ethnologia Scandinavica. 2016.

Bibtex

@article{90bc99dc469e434e9437a2a4409f766c,
title = "Changing Rural Paradigms: Rural Ethnology between State Interest and Local Activism",
abstract = "In this article I will review the historical, cultural and social formation of rural development policies in Denmark and situate these in a Scandinavian context. The review is based on a reading of commission reports, law documents and texts produced by the planners and scholars involved in regional development, the latter often reflecting upon and justifying their work. This gives us a retrospect on how ethnologists have interacted with rural policies and rural areas in transition. In the latter part of this article, I will have a particular focus on examining the so-called “new rural paradigm” (OECD 2006) and its implications for ethnological scholars and practitioners of today. In the “new rural paradigm”, bottom-up processes, “place-bound” cultural and historical values are highlighted as essential to local development. This of course empowers the ethnologists, but also put us in a position at the very centre of a commodification of “the rural” and rural communities. The article therefore concludes with a discussion of currents trends in regional and rural development and the",
keywords = "Faculty of Humanities, Regional udvikling, velf{\ae}rdssamfund, etnologi, landdistrikter, Ethnology",
author = "H{\o}st, {Jeppe Engset}",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
journal = "Ethnologia Scandinavica",
issn = "0348-9698",
publisher = "SAXO-Institute - Archaeology, Ethnology, Greek & Latin, History",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Changing Rural Paradigms

T2 - Rural Ethnology between State Interest and Local Activism

AU - Høst, Jeppe Engset

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - In this article I will review the historical, cultural and social formation of rural development policies in Denmark and situate these in a Scandinavian context. The review is based on a reading of commission reports, law documents and texts produced by the planners and scholars involved in regional development, the latter often reflecting upon and justifying their work. This gives us a retrospect on how ethnologists have interacted with rural policies and rural areas in transition. In the latter part of this article, I will have a particular focus on examining the so-called “new rural paradigm” (OECD 2006) and its implications for ethnological scholars and practitioners of today. In the “new rural paradigm”, bottom-up processes, “place-bound” cultural and historical values are highlighted as essential to local development. This of course empowers the ethnologists, but also put us in a position at the very centre of a commodification of “the rural” and rural communities. The article therefore concludes with a discussion of currents trends in regional and rural development and the

AB - In this article I will review the historical, cultural and social formation of rural development policies in Denmark and situate these in a Scandinavian context. The review is based on a reading of commission reports, law documents and texts produced by the planners and scholars involved in regional development, the latter often reflecting upon and justifying their work. This gives us a retrospect on how ethnologists have interacted with rural policies and rural areas in transition. In the latter part of this article, I will have a particular focus on examining the so-called “new rural paradigm” (OECD 2006) and its implications for ethnological scholars and practitioners of today. In the “new rural paradigm”, bottom-up processes, “place-bound” cultural and historical values are highlighted as essential to local development. This of course empowers the ethnologists, but also put us in a position at the very centre of a commodification of “the rural” and rural communities. The article therefore concludes with a discussion of currents trends in regional and rural development and the

KW - Faculty of Humanities

KW - Regional udvikling

KW - velfærdssamfund

KW - etnologi

KW - landdistrikter

KW - Ethnology

M3 - Journal article

JO - Ethnologia Scandinavica

JF - Ethnologia Scandinavica

SN - 0348-9698

ER -

ID: 163957303