Timo Minssen

Timo Minssen

Professor

ORCID: 0000-0002-3286-4888

Publication year:
All
21 - 30 out of 225Page size: 10
  1. 2011
  2. Published

    US Patent Eligibility in the Wake of Bilski v. Kappos: Business as Usual in an Age of New Technologies?

    Minssen, Timo & Schwartz, R., 2011, In: Biotechnology Law Report. 30, 1, p. 3 - 56 54 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

  3. Published

    Erratum: U.S. Patent eligibility in theWake of Bilski v Kappos: 'Business as usual' in an age of new technologies? (Biotechnology Law Report 30 (2011) (6))

    Minssen, Timo & Schwartz, R. M., 1 Apr 2011, In: Biotechnology Law Report. 30, 2, 1 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › Research › peer-review

  4. 2012
  5. Published

    Assessing the Inventiveness of Bio-Pharmaceuticals under European and US Patent Law: A comparative study with special emphasis on DNA- & protein-related inventions

    Minssen, Timo, 2012, Lund: Ineko /Intellecta AB. 430 p.

    Research output: Book/Report › Doctoral thesis › Research

  6. Published

    Patents and Technological Progress in a Globalized World-Liber Amicorum Joseph Straus: A review

    Minssen, Timo, 2012, In: The IP Law Book Review. 2, 2, p. 83 - 102 20 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journal › Literature review › Research › peer-review

  7. Published

    Standing on shaky ground- US patent-eligibility of isolated DNA and genetic diagnostics after AMP v. USPTO - Part II (practical implications & chances for Supreme Court Review)

    Minssen, Timo & Nilsson, D., 2012, In: Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property. 2, 2, p. 136-157 21 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

  8. Published

    Standing on shaky ground- US patent-eligibility of isolated DNA and genetic diagnostics after AMP v. USPTO - Part III (unsolved questions & subsequent case law)

    Minssen, Timo & Nilsson, D., 2012, In: Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property. 2, 3, p. 225-249 25 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

  9. Published

    The US Supreme Court in Mayo v. Prometheus - Taking the fire from or to biotechnology and personalized medicine? Supreme Court of the United States, Mayo Collaborative Services, dba Mayo Medical Laboratories, et al., Petitioners v Prometheus Laboratories, Inc ., 132 S.Ct. 1289

    Minssen, Timo & Nilsson, D., 2012, In: Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property. 2, 4, p. 376-388 13 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journal › Review › Research › peer-review

  10. Published

    The industrial application requirement for biotech inventions in light of recent EPO & UK case law: A plausible "hunting license"?"

    Minssen, Timo & Nilsson, D., 2012, In: European Intellectual Property Review. 34, 10, p. 689-703 15 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

  11. Published

    What intent, whose intent and to what extent? The Knowledge requirement in indirect patent infringement

    Nilsson, D. & Minssen, Timo, 2012, In: Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice. 7, 6, p. 437-448 27 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

  12. 2013
  13. Published

    Standing on shaky ground- US patent-eligibility of isolated DNA and genetic diagnostics after AMP v. USPTO - Part IV

    Minssen, Timo & Schwartz, R. M., 2013, In: Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property. 3, 2, p. 118-144 27 p.

    Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ...23 Next

ID: 16150437