Variaţii privind trimiterile preliminare la Curtea de Justiţie provenite din statele membre – Sunt factorii structurali (parte a) explicaţiei?

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

Variaţii privind trimiterile preliminare la Curtea de Justiţie provenite din statele membre – Sunt factorii structurali (parte a) explicaţiei? / Broberg, Morten; Fenger, Niels.

In: Revista Romana de Drept European, No. 3, 2013, p. 121-136.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Broberg, M & Fenger, N 2013, 'Variaţii privind trimiterile preliminare la Curtea de Justiţie provenite din statele membre – Sunt factorii structurali (parte a) explicaţiei?', Revista Romana de Drept European, no. 3, pp. 121-136.

APA

Broberg, M., & Fenger, N. (2013). Variaţii privind trimiterile preliminare la Curtea de Justiţie provenite din statele membre – Sunt factorii structurali (parte a) explicaţiei? Revista Romana de Drept European, (3), 121-136.

Vancouver

Broberg M, Fenger N. Variaţii privind trimiterile preliminare la Curtea de Justiţie provenite din statele membre – Sunt factorii structurali (parte a) explicaţiei? Revista Romana de Drept European. 2013;(3):121-136.

Author

Broberg, Morten ; Fenger, Niels. / Variaţii privind trimiterile preliminare la Curtea de Justiţie provenite din statele membre – Sunt factorii structurali (parte a) explicaţiei?. In: Revista Romana de Drept European. 2013 ; No. 3. pp. 121-136.

Bibtex

@article{40237fe1fe954568b14c659c2521276c,
title = "Varia{\c t}ii privind trimiterile preliminare la Curtea de Justi{\c t}ie provenite din statele membre – Sunt factorii structurali (parte a) explica{\c t}iei?",
abstract = "The preliminary reference procedure in Article 267 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), which enables national courts to request the Court of Justice to provide a ruling on the interpretation or validity of an EU legal act, is widely considered to be the jewel in the crown of EU law. When considering the number of references from different Member States, it will become immediately apparent that there are considerable variations. This article examines to what extent these variations may be explained by three structural factors, namely (1) population size, (2) willingness to litigate, and (3) Member State compliance with EU law. It is concluded that some - but not all - of the variations in number of references from Member State judiciaries may be attributed to structural factors rather than being merely a reflection of different Member State courts{\textquoteright} willingness to make use of Article 267 TFEU on such references (the so-called behavioural factors).",
author = "Morten Broberg and Niels Fenger",
year = "2013",
language = "Rum{\ae}nsk",
pages = "121--136",
journal = "Revista Romana de Drept European",
issn = "2068-8083",
publisher = "Wolters Kluwer ",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Variaţii privind trimiterile preliminare la Curtea de Justiţie provenite din statele membre – Sunt factorii structurali (parte a) explicaţiei?

AU - Broberg, Morten

AU - Fenger, Niels

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - The preliminary reference procedure in Article 267 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), which enables national courts to request the Court of Justice to provide a ruling on the interpretation or validity of an EU legal act, is widely considered to be the jewel in the crown of EU law. When considering the number of references from different Member States, it will become immediately apparent that there are considerable variations. This article examines to what extent these variations may be explained by three structural factors, namely (1) population size, (2) willingness to litigate, and (3) Member State compliance with EU law. It is concluded that some - but not all - of the variations in number of references from Member State judiciaries may be attributed to structural factors rather than being merely a reflection of different Member State courts’ willingness to make use of Article 267 TFEU on such references (the so-called behavioural factors).

AB - The preliminary reference procedure in Article 267 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), which enables national courts to request the Court of Justice to provide a ruling on the interpretation or validity of an EU legal act, is widely considered to be the jewel in the crown of EU law. When considering the number of references from different Member States, it will become immediately apparent that there are considerable variations. This article examines to what extent these variations may be explained by three structural factors, namely (1) population size, (2) willingness to litigate, and (3) Member State compliance with EU law. It is concluded that some - but not all - of the variations in number of references from Member State judiciaries may be attributed to structural factors rather than being merely a reflection of different Member State courts’ willingness to make use of Article 267 TFEU on such references (the so-called behavioural factors).

M3 - Tidsskriftartikel

SP - 121

EP - 136

JO - Revista Romana de Drept European

JF - Revista Romana de Drept European

SN - 2068-8083

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 50915025