Theorizing the form and impact of sport scandals

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Theorizing the form and impact of sport scandals. / Wagner, Ulrik; Storm, Rasmus.

In: International Review for the Sociology of Sport, Vol. 57, No. 6, 2022, p. 821-844.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Wagner, U & Storm, R 2022, 'Theorizing the form and impact of sport scandals', International Review for the Sociology of Sport, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 821-844. https://doi.org/10.1177/10126902211043999

APA

Wagner, U., & Storm, R. (2022). Theorizing the form and impact of sport scandals. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 57(6), 821-844. https://doi.org/10.1177/10126902211043999

Vancouver

Wagner U, Storm R. Theorizing the form and impact of sport scandals. International Review for the Sociology of Sport. 2022;57(6):821-844. https://doi.org/10.1177/10126902211043999

Author

Wagner, Ulrik ; Storm, Rasmus. / Theorizing the form and impact of sport scandals. In: International Review for the Sociology of Sport. 2022 ; Vol. 57, No. 6. pp. 821-844.

Bibtex

@article{2f698c604c644103a7abd88573f512b0,
title = "Theorizing the form and impact of sport scandals",
abstract = "Sport scandals have attracted significant interest within and beyond the sociology of sport. However, developing a theoretical understanding of sport scandals has so far been neglected. Therefore, the two-fold purpose of this conceptual paper is to outline a theoretical model for understanding the form of a sport scandal, and to construct two typical sport scandals that can assist us in theorizing and differentiating how sport scandals may have varying effects on society. In our work, we rely on insights on form formulated by the German sociologist Niklas Luhmann combined with notions of ideal types derived from Max Weber. Accordingly, scandals are described as examples of paradoxical forms where excluded meaning re-enters to create spaces of temporary liminality. Despite their common characteristics, we are able to construct two ideal types of scandals – bureaucratic fallacy and charismatic failure – to understand why scandals may have varying impacts on the environment.",
keywords = "Faculty of Science, Luhmann, Weber, Meaning, Ideal types, Bureaucratic fallacy, Charismatic failure",
author = "Ulrik Wagner and Rasmus Storm",
note = "CURIS 2022 NEXS 186",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1177/10126902211043999",
language = "English",
volume = "57",
pages = "821--844",
journal = "International Review for the Sociology of Sport",
issn = "1012-6902",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Theorizing the form and impact of sport scandals

AU - Wagner, Ulrik

AU - Storm, Rasmus

N1 - CURIS 2022 NEXS 186

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Sport scandals have attracted significant interest within and beyond the sociology of sport. However, developing a theoretical understanding of sport scandals has so far been neglected. Therefore, the two-fold purpose of this conceptual paper is to outline a theoretical model for understanding the form of a sport scandal, and to construct two typical sport scandals that can assist us in theorizing and differentiating how sport scandals may have varying effects on society. In our work, we rely on insights on form formulated by the German sociologist Niklas Luhmann combined with notions of ideal types derived from Max Weber. Accordingly, scandals are described as examples of paradoxical forms where excluded meaning re-enters to create spaces of temporary liminality. Despite their common characteristics, we are able to construct two ideal types of scandals – bureaucratic fallacy and charismatic failure – to understand why scandals may have varying impacts on the environment.

AB - Sport scandals have attracted significant interest within and beyond the sociology of sport. However, developing a theoretical understanding of sport scandals has so far been neglected. Therefore, the two-fold purpose of this conceptual paper is to outline a theoretical model for understanding the form of a sport scandal, and to construct two typical sport scandals that can assist us in theorizing and differentiating how sport scandals may have varying effects on society. In our work, we rely on insights on form formulated by the German sociologist Niklas Luhmann combined with notions of ideal types derived from Max Weber. Accordingly, scandals are described as examples of paradoxical forms where excluded meaning re-enters to create spaces of temporary liminality. Despite their common characteristics, we are able to construct two ideal types of scandals – bureaucratic fallacy and charismatic failure – to understand why scandals may have varying impacts on the environment.

KW - Faculty of Science

KW - Luhmann

KW - Weber

KW - Meaning

KW - Ideal types

KW - Bureaucratic fallacy

KW - Charismatic failure

U2 - 10.1177/10126902211043999

DO - 10.1177/10126902211043999

M3 - Journal article

VL - 57

SP - 821

EP - 844

JO - International Review for the Sociology of Sport

JF - International Review for the Sociology of Sport

SN - 1012-6902

IS - 6

ER -

ID: 276157758