Sustainable food profiling models to inform the development of food labels that account for nutrition and the environment: a systematic review
Research output: Contribution to journal › Review › Research › peer-review
Standard
Sustainable food profiling models to inform the development of food labels that account for nutrition and the environment: a systematic review. / Bunge, Anne Charlotte; Wickramasinghe, Kremlin; Renzella, Jessica; Clark, Michael; Rayner, Mike; Rippin, Holly; Halloran, Afton; Roberts, Nia; Breda, João.
In: The Lancet Planetary Health, Vol. 5, No. 11, 2021, p. e818-e826.Research output: Contribution to journal › Review › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Sustainable food profiling models to inform the development of food labels that account for nutrition and the environment: a systematic review
AU - Bunge, Anne Charlotte
AU - Wickramasinghe, Kremlin
AU - Renzella, Jessica
AU - Clark, Michael
AU - Rayner, Mike
AU - Rippin, Holly
AU - Halloran, Afton
AU - Roberts, Nia
AU - Breda, João
N1 - Copyright © 2021 This is an Open Access article published under the CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 IGO license which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. In any use of this article, there should be no suggestion that WHO endorses any specific organisation, products or services. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. This notice should be preserved along with the article's original URL.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Sustainable food profiling models (SFPMs) are the scientific basis for the labelling of food products according to their environmental and nutritional impact, allowing consumers to make informed choices. We identified ten SFPMs that score individual foods according to at least two environmental indicators, with the most common being greenhouse gas emissions (n=10) and water use (n=8). Six models additionally assessed the nutritional quality of foods and presented different methods to combine nutritional and environmental indicators. Key advantages of identified models include a wide range in system boundaries, reference units, approaches for defining cutoff values, design proposals for food labelling schemes, and the comprehensive geographical scope of the lifecycle inventory databases used in the development phase of the model. Key disadvantages of identified models include inconsistent methods for food classification and poor replicability due to unclear methods, unavailable code for environmental and nutritional impact calculation, and unclear cutoff values. We found that few SFPMs to date account for at least two environmental impact factors, and even fewer include nutritional values or other dimensions of sustainability. This systematic review highlights the need to use consistent components and to develop national and international reference values for the classification of sustainable food to enable standardised food labelling.
AB - Sustainable food profiling models (SFPMs) are the scientific basis for the labelling of food products according to their environmental and nutritional impact, allowing consumers to make informed choices. We identified ten SFPMs that score individual foods according to at least two environmental indicators, with the most common being greenhouse gas emissions (n=10) and water use (n=8). Six models additionally assessed the nutritional quality of foods and presented different methods to combine nutritional and environmental indicators. Key advantages of identified models include a wide range in system boundaries, reference units, approaches for defining cutoff values, design proposals for food labelling schemes, and the comprehensive geographical scope of the lifecycle inventory databases used in the development phase of the model. Key disadvantages of identified models include inconsistent methods for food classification and poor replicability due to unclear methods, unavailable code for environmental and nutritional impact calculation, and unclear cutoff values. We found that few SFPMs to date account for at least two environmental impact factors, and even fewer include nutritional values or other dimensions of sustainability. This systematic review highlights the need to use consistent components and to develop national and international reference values for the classification of sustainable food to enable standardised food labelling.
KW - Faculty of Science
KW - Sustainable food profiling models (SFPMs)
KW - Food labeling
KW - Sustainable food systems
U2 - 10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00231-X
DO - 10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00231-X
M3 - Review
C2 - 34774122
VL - 5
SP - e818-e826
JO - The Lancet Planetary Health
JF - The Lancet Planetary Health
SN - 2542-5196
IS - 11
ER -
ID: 284839350