Comparing deep-end confinement in England & Wales and Norway

Centre for Interdisciplinary Studies of Law (CIS)

Faculty of Law

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

Comparing deep-end confinement in England & Wales and Norway. / Crewe, Ben; Laursen, Julie; Mjåland, Kristian.

In: Criminology, Vol. 61, No. 2, 2022, p. 204-233.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Crewe, B, Laursen, J & Mjåland, K 2022, 'Comparing deep-end confinement in England & Wales and Norway', Criminology, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 204-233. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12326

APA

Crewe, B., Laursen, J., & Mjåland, K. (2022). Comparing deep-end confinement in England & Wales and Norway. Criminology, 61(2), 204-233. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12326

Vancouver

Crewe B, Laursen J, Mjåland K. Comparing deep-end confinement in England & Wales and Norway. Criminology. 2022;61(2):204-233. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12326

Author

Crewe, Ben ; Laursen, Julie ; Mjåland, Kristian. / Comparing deep-end confinement in England & Wales and Norway. In: Criminology. 2022 ; Vol. 61, No. 2. pp. 204-233.

Bibtex

@article{3449ef4897de459899d027d8f044a6bd,

title = "Comparing deep-end confinement in England & Wales and Norway",

abstract = "Extreme forms of custody represent the boundary points of state power. The configuration of the most restrictive corners of prison systems, and what goes on within them, is highly instructive in exposing the objectives, limits, and implications of state coercion at its most severe. Based on data collected in England & Wales and Norway, this article has two main aims. The first is to explore the degree to which “deep-end” confinement differs between jurisdictions with different penal philosophies. The second is to understand how the most extreme form of confinement in each jurisdiction differs from the more typical carceral experiences within each system and its overall penal ethos. Empirically, then, the article seeks to shine light into the deepest dominions of both prison systems, illuminating the experiential texture of extreme forms of imprisonment. It concludes by asking what can be inferred about Nordic exceptionalism, and about deep-end confinement more generally, by analyzing these domains.",

keywords = "comparative penology, depth of imprisonment, extreme custody, imprisonment, “tightness”",

author = "Ben Crewe and Julie Laursen and Kristian Mj{\aa}land",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 The Authors. Criminology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society of Criminology.",

year = "2022",

doi = "10.1111/1745-9125.12326",

language = "English",

volume = "61",

pages = "204--233",

journal = "Criminology",

issn = "0011-1384",

publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing deep-end confinement in England & Wales and Norway

AU - Crewe, Ben

AU - Laursen, Julie

AU - Mjåland, Kristian

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Extreme forms of custody represent the boundary points of state power. The configuration of the most restrictive corners of prison systems, and what goes on within them, is highly instructive in exposing the objectives, limits, and implications of state coercion at its most severe. Based on data collected in England & Wales and Norway, this article has two main aims. The first is to explore the degree to which “deep-end” confinement differs between jurisdictions with different penal philosophies. The second is to understand how the most extreme form of confinement in each jurisdiction differs from the more typical carceral experiences within each system and its overall penal ethos. Empirically, then, the article seeks to shine light into the deepest dominions of both prison systems, illuminating the experiential texture of extreme forms of imprisonment. It concludes by asking what can be inferred about Nordic exceptionalism, and about deep-end confinement more generally, by analyzing these domains.

AB - Extreme forms of custody represent the boundary points of state power. The configuration of the most restrictive corners of prison systems, and what goes on within them, is highly instructive in exposing the objectives, limits, and implications of state coercion at its most severe. Based on data collected in England & Wales and Norway, this article has two main aims. The first is to explore the degree to which “deep-end” confinement differs between jurisdictions with different penal philosophies. The second is to understand how the most extreme form of confinement in each jurisdiction differs from the more typical carceral experiences within each system and its overall penal ethos. Empirically, then, the article seeks to shine light into the deepest dominions of both prison systems, illuminating the experiential texture of extreme forms of imprisonment. It concludes by asking what can be inferred about Nordic exceptionalism, and about deep-end confinement more generally, by analyzing these domains.

KW - comparative penology

KW - depth of imprisonment

KW - extreme custody

KW - imprisonment

KW - “tightness”

U2 - 10.1111/1745-9125.12326

DO - 10.1111/1745-9125.12326

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85144132037

VL - 61

SP - 204

EP - 233

JO - Criminology

JF - Criminology

SN - 0011-1384

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 330669436