The regulation of abusive activity and content: a study of registries’ terms of service
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
The regulation of abusive activity and content: a study of registries’ terms of service. / Schwemer, Sebastian Felix.
In: Internet Policy Review, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2020.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - The regulation of abusive activity and content: a study of registries’ terms of service
AU - Schwemer, Sebastian Felix
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - This paper studies the role of domain registries in relation to unlawful or unwanted use of a domain name or the underlying website content. It is an empirical and conceptual contribution to the online content regulation debate, with specific focus on European country code top-level (ccTLD) domain name registries. An analysis of the terms of service of 30 European ccTLD registries shows that one third of the registries contain some use-related provision, which corresponds to approximately 47% of registered domains. The analysis also turns towards examples of notice-and-takedown mechanisms, the emergence of proactive screening and the practice of data validation. Based on the analysis, it calls for more clarity and transparency regarding domain registries’ role in content- or use-related takedowns.
AB - This paper studies the role of domain registries in relation to unlawful or unwanted use of a domain name or the underlying website content. It is an empirical and conceptual contribution to the online content regulation debate, with specific focus on European country code top-level (ccTLD) domain name registries. An analysis of the terms of service of 30 European ccTLD registries shows that one third of the registries contain some use-related provision, which corresponds to approximately 47% of registered domains. The analysis also turns towards examples of notice-and-takedown mechanisms, the emergence of proactive screening and the practice of data validation. Based on the analysis, it calls for more clarity and transparency regarding domain registries’ role in content- or use-related takedowns.
U2 - 10.14763/2020.1.1448
DO - 10.14763/2020.1.1448
M3 - Journal article
VL - 9
JO - Internet Policy Review
JF - Internet Policy Review
SN - 2197-6775
IS - 1
ER -
ID: 234697277