Constructing populations in biobanking
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
This article poses the question of whether biobanking practices and standards are giving rise to the construction of populations from which various biobanking initiatives increasingly draw on for legitimacy? We argue that although recent biobanking policies encourage various forms of engagement with publics to ensure legitimacy, different biobanks conceptualize their engagement strategies very differently. We suggest that biobanks undertake a broad range of different strategies with regard to engagement. We argue that these different approaches to engagement strategies are contributing to the construction of populations, whereby specific nationalities, communities, societies, patient groups and political systems become imbued or bio-objectified with particular characteristics, such as compliant, distant, positive, commercialized or authoritarian. This bio-objectification process is problematic in relation to policy aspirations ascribed to biobanking engagement since it gives rise to reified notions of different populations.
|Journal||Life Sciences, Society and Policy|
|Number of pages||18|
|Publication status||Published - 2015|
Life Sciences, Society and Policy201511:5
- Biobanking,Bio-objects,Engagement,Governance,Popul, bio-objects, biobanking, engagement, governance, populations