Burn injury does not exacerbate heat strain during exercise while wearing body armor
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Burn injury does not exacerbate heat strain during exercise while wearing body armor. / Fischer, Mads; Cramer, Matthew N; Huang, M U; Belval, Luke N; Watso, Joseph C; Cimino, Frank A; Crandall, Craig G.
In: Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, Vol. 52, No. 10, 2020, p. 2235-2241.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Burn injury does not exacerbate heat strain during exercise while wearing body armor
AU - Fischer, Mads
AU - Cramer, Matthew N
AU - Huang, M U
AU - Belval, Luke N
AU - Watso, Joseph C
AU - Cimino, Frank A
AU - Crandall, Craig G
N1 - CURIS 2020 NEXS 337
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Introduction: Although evaporative heat loss capacity is reduced in burn-injured individuals with extensive skin grafts, the thermoregulatory strain due to a prior burn injury during exercise-heat stress may be negligible if the burn is located underneath protective clothing with low vapor permeability.Purpose: This study aimed to test the hypothesis that heat strain during exercise in a hot-dry environment while wearing protective clothing would be similar with and without a simulated torso burn injury.Methods: Ten healthy individuals (8 men/2 women) underwent three trials wearing: uniform (combat uniform, tactical vest, and replica torso armor plates), uniform with a 20% total body surface area simulated torso burn (uniform + burn), or shorts (and sports bra) only (control). Exercise consisted of treadmill walking (5.3 km·h-1; 3.7% ± 0.9% grade) for 60 min at a target heat production of 6.0 W·kg-1 in 40.0°C ± 0.1°C and 20.0% ± 0.6% relative humidity conditions. Measurements included rectal temperature, heart rate, ratings of perceived exertion (RPE), and thermal sensation.Results: No differences in rectal temperature (P ≥ 0.85), heart rate (P ≥ 0.99), thermal sensation (P ≥ 0.73), or RPE (P ≥ 0.13) occurred between uniform + burn and uniform trials. In the control trial, however, core temperature, heart rate, thermal sensation, and RPE were lower compared with the uniform and uniform + burn trials (P ≤ 0.04 for all).Conclusions: A 20% total body surface area simulated torso burn injury does not further exacerbate heat strain when wearing a combat uniform. These findings suggest that the physiological strain associated with torso burn injuries is not different from noninjured individuals when wearing protective clothing during an acute exercise-heat stress.
AB - Introduction: Although evaporative heat loss capacity is reduced in burn-injured individuals with extensive skin grafts, the thermoregulatory strain due to a prior burn injury during exercise-heat stress may be negligible if the burn is located underneath protective clothing with low vapor permeability.Purpose: This study aimed to test the hypothesis that heat strain during exercise in a hot-dry environment while wearing protective clothing would be similar with and without a simulated torso burn injury.Methods: Ten healthy individuals (8 men/2 women) underwent three trials wearing: uniform (combat uniform, tactical vest, and replica torso armor plates), uniform with a 20% total body surface area simulated torso burn (uniform + burn), or shorts (and sports bra) only (control). Exercise consisted of treadmill walking (5.3 km·h-1; 3.7% ± 0.9% grade) for 60 min at a target heat production of 6.0 W·kg-1 in 40.0°C ± 0.1°C and 20.0% ± 0.6% relative humidity conditions. Measurements included rectal temperature, heart rate, ratings of perceived exertion (RPE), and thermal sensation.Results: No differences in rectal temperature (P ≥ 0.85), heart rate (P ≥ 0.99), thermal sensation (P ≥ 0.73), or RPE (P ≥ 0.13) occurred between uniform + burn and uniform trials. In the control trial, however, core temperature, heart rate, thermal sensation, and RPE were lower compared with the uniform and uniform + burn trials (P ≤ 0.04 for all).Conclusions: A 20% total body surface area simulated torso burn injury does not further exacerbate heat strain when wearing a combat uniform. These findings suggest that the physiological strain associated with torso burn injuries is not different from noninjured individuals when wearing protective clothing during an acute exercise-heat stress.
KW - Faculty of Science
KW - Military
KW - Core temperature
KW - Burn survivor
KW - Evaporative heat loss
KW - Heat strain
KW - Exercise-heat stress
U2 - 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002375
DO - 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002375
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 32936596
VL - 52
SP - 2235
EP - 2241
JO - Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
JF - Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
SN - 0195-9131
IS - 10
ER -
ID: 250556455