Why still in hospital after laparoscopic colorectal surgery within an enhanced recovery programme?

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Why still in hospital after laparoscopic colorectal surgery within an enhanced recovery programme? / Munk-Madsen, P.; Eriksen, J. R.; Kehlet, H.; Gögenur, I.

In: Colorectal Disease, Vol. 21, No. 12, 2019, p. 1438-1444.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Munk-Madsen, P, Eriksen, JR, Kehlet, H & Gögenur, I 2019, 'Why still in hospital after laparoscopic colorectal surgery within an enhanced recovery programme?', Colorectal Disease, vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 1438-1444. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.14762

APA

Munk-Madsen, P., Eriksen, J. R., Kehlet, H., & Gögenur, I. (2019). Why still in hospital after laparoscopic colorectal surgery within an enhanced recovery programme? Colorectal Disease, 21(12), 1438-1444. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.14762

Vancouver

Munk-Madsen P, Eriksen JR, Kehlet H, Gögenur I. Why still in hospital after laparoscopic colorectal surgery within an enhanced recovery programme? Colorectal Disease. 2019;21(12):1438-1444. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.14762

Author

Munk-Madsen, P. ; Eriksen, J. R. ; Kehlet, H. ; Gögenur, I. / Why still in hospital after laparoscopic colorectal surgery within an enhanced recovery programme?. In: Colorectal Disease. 2019 ; Vol. 21, No. 12. pp. 1438-1444.

Bibtex

@article{96eeb70161c1472994cc640bb8a7fd87,
title = "Why still in hospital after laparoscopic colorectal surgery within an enhanced recovery programme?",
abstract = "Aim: Enhanced recovery after surgery programmes in elective colorectal surgery have been developed and implemented widely, but a subgroup of patients may still require longer hospital stays than expected. The aim of this study was to identify and describe factors compromising early postoperative recovery by asking {\textquoteleft}why is the patient still in hospital today?{\textquoteright} after laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery within an enhanced recovery after surgery programme. Method: Patients undergoing elective laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection were evaluated postoperatively with predefined potential reasons for still being in hospital. The primary outcome was {\textquoteleft}reason for still being in hospital{\textquoteright} on postoperative day 0–4 and secondarily length of stay with a focus on differences between patients with and without a stoma. Results: Ninety-six patients having colorectal cancer surgery were included. The median length of stay for the whole group was 3 days (range 1–14). The four dominant causes for patients without a stoma to be in hospital were lack of gastrointestinal function, lack of early mobilization, lack of normal micturition and nausea. Patients with a stoma stayed in hospital due to stoma training, lack of gastrointestinal function, lack of free micturition and a miscellaneous {\textquoteleft}others{\textquoteright} group. Conclusion: Delayed gastrointestinal function, insufficient mobilization, poor urinary function and stoma care training have been characterized as dominant compromising factors for postoperative recovery. Together with a focus on frailty, future studies should focus on improving early mobilization, prevention and treatment of postoperative urinary retention and improved stoma care training, in order to minimize delay in postoperative recovery and discharge.",
keywords = "delayed postoperative recovery, ERAS, ileus, laparoscopic colorectal surgery, length of stay",
author = "P. Munk-Madsen and Eriksen, {J. R.} and H. Kehlet and I. G{\"o}genur",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1111/codi.14762",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "1438--1444",
journal = "Colorectal Disease",
issn = "1462-8910",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "12",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Why still in hospital after laparoscopic colorectal surgery within an enhanced recovery programme?

AU - Munk-Madsen, P.

AU - Eriksen, J. R.

AU - Kehlet, H.

AU - Gögenur, I.

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Aim: Enhanced recovery after surgery programmes in elective colorectal surgery have been developed and implemented widely, but a subgroup of patients may still require longer hospital stays than expected. The aim of this study was to identify and describe factors compromising early postoperative recovery by asking ‘why is the patient still in hospital today?’ after laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery within an enhanced recovery after surgery programme. Method: Patients undergoing elective laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection were evaluated postoperatively with predefined potential reasons for still being in hospital. The primary outcome was ‘reason for still being in hospital’ on postoperative day 0–4 and secondarily length of stay with a focus on differences between patients with and without a stoma. Results: Ninety-six patients having colorectal cancer surgery were included. The median length of stay for the whole group was 3 days (range 1–14). The four dominant causes for patients without a stoma to be in hospital were lack of gastrointestinal function, lack of early mobilization, lack of normal micturition and nausea. Patients with a stoma stayed in hospital due to stoma training, lack of gastrointestinal function, lack of free micturition and a miscellaneous ‘others’ group. Conclusion: Delayed gastrointestinal function, insufficient mobilization, poor urinary function and stoma care training have been characterized as dominant compromising factors for postoperative recovery. Together with a focus on frailty, future studies should focus on improving early mobilization, prevention and treatment of postoperative urinary retention and improved stoma care training, in order to minimize delay in postoperative recovery and discharge.

AB - Aim: Enhanced recovery after surgery programmes in elective colorectal surgery have been developed and implemented widely, but a subgroup of patients may still require longer hospital stays than expected. The aim of this study was to identify and describe factors compromising early postoperative recovery by asking ‘why is the patient still in hospital today?’ after laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery within an enhanced recovery after surgery programme. Method: Patients undergoing elective laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection were evaluated postoperatively with predefined potential reasons for still being in hospital. The primary outcome was ‘reason for still being in hospital’ on postoperative day 0–4 and secondarily length of stay with a focus on differences between patients with and without a stoma. Results: Ninety-six patients having colorectal cancer surgery were included. The median length of stay for the whole group was 3 days (range 1–14). The four dominant causes for patients without a stoma to be in hospital were lack of gastrointestinal function, lack of early mobilization, lack of normal micturition and nausea. Patients with a stoma stayed in hospital due to stoma training, lack of gastrointestinal function, lack of free micturition and a miscellaneous ‘others’ group. Conclusion: Delayed gastrointestinal function, insufficient mobilization, poor urinary function and stoma care training have been characterized as dominant compromising factors for postoperative recovery. Together with a focus on frailty, future studies should focus on improving early mobilization, prevention and treatment of postoperative urinary retention and improved stoma care training, in order to minimize delay in postoperative recovery and discharge.

KW - delayed postoperative recovery

KW - ERAS

KW - ileus

KW - laparoscopic colorectal surgery

KW - length of stay

U2 - 10.1111/codi.14762

DO - 10.1111/codi.14762

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 31309661

AN - SCOPUS:85070767142

VL - 21

SP - 1438

EP - 1444

JO - Colorectal Disease

JF - Colorectal Disease

SN - 1462-8910

IS - 12

ER -

ID: 236216671