The removal of protein from mineral surfaces: Implications for residue analysis of archaeological materials

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Standard

The removal of protein from mineral surfaces : Implications for residue analysis of archaeological materials. / Craig, Oliver E.; Collins, Matthew J.

In: Journal of Archaeological Science, Vol. 29, No. 10, 2002, p. 1077-1082.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Craig, OE & Collins, MJ 2002, 'The removal of protein from mineral surfaces: Implications for residue analysis of archaeological materials', Journal of Archaeological Science, vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 1077-1082. https://doi.org/10.1006/jasc.2001.0757

APA

Craig, O. E., & Collins, M. J. (2002). The removal of protein from mineral surfaces: Implications for residue analysis of archaeological materials. Journal of Archaeological Science, 29(10), 1077-1082. https://doi.org/10.1006/jasc.2001.0757

Vancouver

Craig OE, Collins MJ. The removal of protein from mineral surfaces: Implications for residue analysis of archaeological materials. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2002;29(10):1077-1082. https://doi.org/10.1006/jasc.2001.0757

Author

Craig, Oliver E. ; Collins, Matthew J. / The removal of protein from mineral surfaces : Implications for residue analysis of archaeological materials. In: Journal of Archaeological Science. 2002 ; Vol. 29, No. 10. pp. 1077-1082.

Bibtex

@article{4fcb1719e11f4f45b18a34b010fde7a9,
title = "The removal of protein from mineral surfaces: Implications for residue analysis of archaeological materials",
abstract = "Although there has been great interest and controversy concerning the detection of proteins in archaeological residues, very few studies have considered the effect of different extraction methods. Using well-defined control materials, this study compares the extraction efficiency of a number of different extraction reagents. Immunological and spectro-photometric assays are used to assess the amount of protein removed by each extraction method and the effectiveness is reported with reference to previous work. None of the previously reported methods were found to be effective at removing the protein from the mineral surface. We conclude that proteins are very strongly bound to the surface probably via short-range bonds. Although this may be encouraging for the long-term preservation of proteins in this context, extraction methods will have to be re-evaluated in order to achieve efficient recovery.",
keywords = "Ancient proteins, Elisa, Mineral surface, Residue analysis, Sorption experiments",
author = "Craig, {Oliver E.} and Collins, {Matthew J.}",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1006/jasc.2001.0757",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "1077--1082",
journal = "Journal of Archaeological Science",
issn = "0305-4403",
publisher = "Academic Press",
number = "10",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The removal of protein from mineral surfaces

T2 - Implications for residue analysis of archaeological materials

AU - Craig, Oliver E.

AU - Collins, Matthew J.

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Although there has been great interest and controversy concerning the detection of proteins in archaeological residues, very few studies have considered the effect of different extraction methods. Using well-defined control materials, this study compares the extraction efficiency of a number of different extraction reagents. Immunological and spectro-photometric assays are used to assess the amount of protein removed by each extraction method and the effectiveness is reported with reference to previous work. None of the previously reported methods were found to be effective at removing the protein from the mineral surface. We conclude that proteins are very strongly bound to the surface probably via short-range bonds. Although this may be encouraging for the long-term preservation of proteins in this context, extraction methods will have to be re-evaluated in order to achieve efficient recovery.

AB - Although there has been great interest and controversy concerning the detection of proteins in archaeological residues, very few studies have considered the effect of different extraction methods. Using well-defined control materials, this study compares the extraction efficiency of a number of different extraction reagents. Immunological and spectro-photometric assays are used to assess the amount of protein removed by each extraction method and the effectiveness is reported with reference to previous work. None of the previously reported methods were found to be effective at removing the protein from the mineral surface. We conclude that proteins are very strongly bound to the surface probably via short-range bonds. Although this may be encouraging for the long-term preservation of proteins in this context, extraction methods will have to be re-evaluated in order to achieve efficient recovery.

KW - Ancient proteins

KW - Elisa

KW - Mineral surface

KW - Residue analysis

KW - Sorption experiments

U2 - 10.1006/jasc.2001.0757

DO - 10.1006/jasc.2001.0757

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:0036786128

VL - 29

SP - 1077

EP - 1082

JO - Journal of Archaeological Science

JF - Journal of Archaeological Science

SN - 0305-4403

IS - 10

ER -

ID: 232090517