Revision Risk After Primary Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery: A Nationwide Study With Two-Year Follow-up
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Revision Risk After Primary Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery : A Nationwide Study With Two-Year Follow-up. / Pitter, Frederik T.; Lindberg-Larsen, Martin; Pedersen, Alma B.; Dahl, Benny; Gehrchen, Martin.
In: Spine Deformity, Vol. 7, No. 4, 2019, p. 619-626.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Revision Risk After Primary Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery
T2 - A Nationwide Study With Two-Year Follow-up
AU - Pitter, Frederik T.
AU - Lindberg-Larsen, Martin
AU - Pedersen, Alma B.
AU - Dahl, Benny
AU - Gehrchen, Martin
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Study Design: Cohort study. Objectives: To report the two-year revision risk following primary adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery, describe reasons for revisions, and assess risk factors for revision surgery. Summary of Background Data: Revision risk following primary ASD surgery has been reported to vary between 7% and 26%, but with loss to follow-up as a considerable challenge. Methods: Patients ≥18 years of age undergoing primary instrumented surgery for ASD in Denmark during 2006–2014 were identified by procedure and diagnosis codes in the Danish National Patient Registry (DNPR). Complete two-year follow-up on revision surgery for each patient was achieved. Medical records were reviewed to determine reasons for revisions. Overall comorbidity was summarized using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) based on DNPR data; low comorbidity (CCI 0); medium comorbidity (CCI 1–2); and high comorbidity (CCI ≥3). Risk factors for revision were assessed in a Cox regression model. Results: A total of 553 patients were identified. Of these, 19.9% were revised within the two-year follow-up and 7.2% of patients were revised more than once. Median time to revision was 308 days (interquartile range 105–508). The most common reason for revision was implant failure (38.2%) followed by infection (11.8%). Increased age (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01–1.26, per 10 years increment) and high comorbidity burden (HR = 2.10, 95% CI 1.16–3.79) were associated with increased revision risk. Risk of revision increased from 2006 to 2014; hence, year of primary surgery (with 2006 as reference) was associated with increased revision risk (HR = 1.09, 95% CI 1.01–1.18). Conclusions: The revision risk within 2 years after primary ASD surgery was 19.9% nationwide in Denmark, and implant failure was the most common reason for revision. Increased comorbidity and age were separately associated with increased risk of revision. Level of Evidence: Level II.
AB - Study Design: Cohort study. Objectives: To report the two-year revision risk following primary adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery, describe reasons for revisions, and assess risk factors for revision surgery. Summary of Background Data: Revision risk following primary ASD surgery has been reported to vary between 7% and 26%, but with loss to follow-up as a considerable challenge. Methods: Patients ≥18 years of age undergoing primary instrumented surgery for ASD in Denmark during 2006–2014 were identified by procedure and diagnosis codes in the Danish National Patient Registry (DNPR). Complete two-year follow-up on revision surgery for each patient was achieved. Medical records were reviewed to determine reasons for revisions. Overall comorbidity was summarized using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) based on DNPR data; low comorbidity (CCI 0); medium comorbidity (CCI 1–2); and high comorbidity (CCI ≥3). Risk factors for revision were assessed in a Cox regression model. Results: A total of 553 patients were identified. Of these, 19.9% were revised within the two-year follow-up and 7.2% of patients were revised more than once. Median time to revision was 308 days (interquartile range 105–508). The most common reason for revision was implant failure (38.2%) followed by infection (11.8%). Increased age (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01–1.26, per 10 years increment) and high comorbidity burden (HR = 2.10, 95% CI 1.16–3.79) were associated with increased revision risk. Risk of revision increased from 2006 to 2014; hence, year of primary surgery (with 2006 as reference) was associated with increased revision risk (HR = 1.09, 95% CI 1.01–1.18). Conclusions: The revision risk within 2 years after primary ASD surgery was 19.9% nationwide in Denmark, and implant failure was the most common reason for revision. Increased comorbidity and age were separately associated with increased risk of revision. Level of Evidence: Level II.
KW - Adult spinal deformity
KW - Charlson Comorbidity Index
KW - Nationwide follow-up
KW - Primary surgery
KW - Revision risk
U2 - 10.1016/j.jspd.2018.10.006
DO - 10.1016/j.jspd.2018.10.006
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 31202380
AN - SCOPUS:85058969582
VL - 7
SP - 619
EP - 626
JO - Spine Deformity
JF - Spine Deformity
SN - 2212-134X
IS - 4
ER -
ID: 220853156