Probing paracellular -versus transcellular tissue barrier permeability using a gut mucosal explant culture system

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Probing paracellular -versus transcellular tissue barrier permeability using a gut mucosal explant culture system. / Danielsen, E. Michael; Hansen, Gert H.

In: Tissue Barriers, Vol. 7, No. 1, 1601955, 2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Danielsen, EM & Hansen, GH 2019, 'Probing paracellular -versus transcellular tissue barrier permeability using a gut mucosal explant culture system', Tissue Barriers, vol. 7, no. 1, 1601955. https://doi.org/10.1080/21688370.2019.1601955

APA

Danielsen, E. M., & Hansen, G. H. (2019). Probing paracellular -versus transcellular tissue barrier permeability using a gut mucosal explant culture system. Tissue Barriers, 7(1), [1601955]. https://doi.org/10.1080/21688370.2019.1601955

Vancouver

Danielsen EM, Hansen GH. Probing paracellular -versus transcellular tissue barrier permeability using a gut mucosal explant culture system. Tissue Barriers. 2019;7(1). 1601955. https://doi.org/10.1080/21688370.2019.1601955

Author

Danielsen, E. Michael ; Hansen, Gert H. / Probing paracellular -versus transcellular tissue barrier permeability using a gut mucosal explant culture system. In: Tissue Barriers. 2019 ; Vol. 7, No. 1.

Bibtex

@article{3e52db1c69aa44e68f063a7969b739f1,
title = "Probing paracellular -versus transcellular tissue barrier permeability using a gut mucosal explant culture system",
abstract = "Intestinal permeation enhancers (PEs), i.e. agents improving oral delivery of therapeutic drugs with poor bioavailability, may typically act by two principally different mechanisms: to increase either transcellular -or paracellular passage across the epithelium. With the aim to define these different modes of action in a small intestinal mucosal explant system, the transcellular-acting PE sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) was compared to the paracellular-acting PE ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), using several fluorescent polar–and lipophilic probes. Here, SDS rendered the enterocyte cell membranes leaky for the relatively small polar tracers Lucifer yellow and a 3 kD Texas red-conjugated dextran, but most conspicuously SDS blocked constitutive endocytosis from the brush border. In contrast, the main action of EDTA was to increase paracellular passage across the epithelium of both polar probes, including 10–and 70 kDa dextrans and lipophilic probes, visualized by distinct stripy lateral staining of enterocytes and/or accumulation in the lamina propria. In addition, EDTA caused a loss of epithelial cell polarity by opening tight junctions for diffusion of domain-specific basolateral/apical cell membrane protein markers into the opposite domains. By transmission electron microscopy, SDS caused the formation of vacuoles and vesicle-like structures at the lateral cell membranes. In contrast, EDTA led to a bulging of the whole enterocyte apex, resulting in a “cobblestone” appearance of the epithelium, probably caused by an extreme contraction of the perijunctional actomyosin ring. We conclude that the mucosal explant system is a convenient model for predicting transcellular/paracellular modes of action of novel prospective PEs.",
keywords = "brush border, enterocyte, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), Intestinal permeation enhancers (PEs), small intestine, sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS)",
author = "Danielsen, {E. Michael} and Hansen, {Gert H.}",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1080/21688370.2019.1601955",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
journal = "Tissue Barriers",
issn = "2168-8370",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Probing paracellular -versus transcellular tissue barrier permeability using a gut mucosal explant culture system

AU - Danielsen, E. Michael

AU - Hansen, Gert H.

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Intestinal permeation enhancers (PEs), i.e. agents improving oral delivery of therapeutic drugs with poor bioavailability, may typically act by two principally different mechanisms: to increase either transcellular -or paracellular passage across the epithelium. With the aim to define these different modes of action in a small intestinal mucosal explant system, the transcellular-acting PE sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) was compared to the paracellular-acting PE ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), using several fluorescent polar–and lipophilic probes. Here, SDS rendered the enterocyte cell membranes leaky for the relatively small polar tracers Lucifer yellow and a 3 kD Texas red-conjugated dextran, but most conspicuously SDS blocked constitutive endocytosis from the brush border. In contrast, the main action of EDTA was to increase paracellular passage across the epithelium of both polar probes, including 10–and 70 kDa dextrans and lipophilic probes, visualized by distinct stripy lateral staining of enterocytes and/or accumulation in the lamina propria. In addition, EDTA caused a loss of epithelial cell polarity by opening tight junctions for diffusion of domain-specific basolateral/apical cell membrane protein markers into the opposite domains. By transmission electron microscopy, SDS caused the formation of vacuoles and vesicle-like structures at the lateral cell membranes. In contrast, EDTA led to a bulging of the whole enterocyte apex, resulting in a “cobblestone” appearance of the epithelium, probably caused by an extreme contraction of the perijunctional actomyosin ring. We conclude that the mucosal explant system is a convenient model for predicting transcellular/paracellular modes of action of novel prospective PEs.

AB - Intestinal permeation enhancers (PEs), i.e. agents improving oral delivery of therapeutic drugs with poor bioavailability, may typically act by two principally different mechanisms: to increase either transcellular -or paracellular passage across the epithelium. With the aim to define these different modes of action in a small intestinal mucosal explant system, the transcellular-acting PE sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) was compared to the paracellular-acting PE ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), using several fluorescent polar–and lipophilic probes. Here, SDS rendered the enterocyte cell membranes leaky for the relatively small polar tracers Lucifer yellow and a 3 kD Texas red-conjugated dextran, but most conspicuously SDS blocked constitutive endocytosis from the brush border. In contrast, the main action of EDTA was to increase paracellular passage across the epithelium of both polar probes, including 10–and 70 kDa dextrans and lipophilic probes, visualized by distinct stripy lateral staining of enterocytes and/or accumulation in the lamina propria. In addition, EDTA caused a loss of epithelial cell polarity by opening tight junctions for diffusion of domain-specific basolateral/apical cell membrane protein markers into the opposite domains. By transmission electron microscopy, SDS caused the formation of vacuoles and vesicle-like structures at the lateral cell membranes. In contrast, EDTA led to a bulging of the whole enterocyte apex, resulting in a “cobblestone” appearance of the epithelium, probably caused by an extreme contraction of the perijunctional actomyosin ring. We conclude that the mucosal explant system is a convenient model for predicting transcellular/paracellular modes of action of novel prospective PEs.

KW - brush border

KW - enterocyte

KW - ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)

KW - Intestinal permeation enhancers (PEs)

KW - small intestine

KW - sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS)

U2 - 10.1080/21688370.2019.1601955

DO - 10.1080/21688370.2019.1601955

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 30999787

AN - SCOPUS:85064699010

VL - 7

JO - Tissue Barriers

JF - Tissue Barriers

SN - 2168-8370

IS - 1

M1 - 1601955

ER -

ID: 226871313