Principles for Responsible Contracts PRC 6: Physical Security for the Project

Research output: Working paperPreprintResearch

Standard

Principles for Responsible Contracts PRC 6: Physical Security for the Project. / MacLeod, Sorcha; Davitti, Daria.

SSRN: Social Science Research Network, 2023. p. 1-8.

Research output: Working paperPreprintResearch

Harvard

MacLeod, S & Davitti, D 2023 'Principles for Responsible Contracts PRC 6: Physical Security for the Project' SSRN: Social Science Research Network, pp. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4338838

APA

MacLeod, S., & Davitti, D. (2023). Principles for Responsible Contracts PRC 6: Physical Security for the Project. (pp. 1-8). SSRN: Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4338838

Vancouver

MacLeod S, Davitti D. Principles for Responsible Contracts PRC 6: Physical Security for the Project. SSRN: Social Science Research Network. 2023, p. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4338838

Author

MacLeod, Sorcha ; Davitti, Daria. / Principles for Responsible Contracts PRC 6: Physical Security for the Project. SSRN: Social Science Research Network, 2023. pp. 1-8

Bibtex

@techreport{c7b69495a8d24a6db6181d07f683ca4a,
title = "Principles for Responsible Contracts PRC 6: Physical Security for the Project",
abstract = "It is well known that security operations, whether public, private, in-house, or public- private hybrids, may give rise to significant human rights issues.1 Consequently, the poorly regulated provision of security for investment projects has long been a source of particular human rights concern.2 This is especially true of large-scale projects involving the exploitation of natural resources, where marginalised groups, such as indigenous communities or minority groups, often experience the harsh impacts of the unrestrained use of force by security actors.3 A lack of well-defined roles and responsibilities; poor recruitment, vetting, and training practices; and limited oversight of security providers result in well-documented human rights abuses and so- called {\textquoteleft}security disparities{\textquoteright} which adversely impact communities.4 Therefore, States and business actors, whether as security actors themselves or as clients of security actors, must ensure that security operations comply with international human rights law and international humanitarian law (IHL) where appropriate, as well as any other applicable international legal provisions, throughout the life of a project.",
author = "Sorcha MacLeod and Daria Davitti",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.2139/ssrn.4338838",
language = "English",
pages = "1--8",
publisher = "SSRN: Social Science Research Network",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "SSRN: Social Science Research Network",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - Principles for Responsible Contracts PRC 6: Physical Security for the Project

AU - MacLeod, Sorcha

AU - Davitti, Daria

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - It is well known that security operations, whether public, private, in-house, or public- private hybrids, may give rise to significant human rights issues.1 Consequently, the poorly regulated provision of security for investment projects has long been a source of particular human rights concern.2 This is especially true of large-scale projects involving the exploitation of natural resources, where marginalised groups, such as indigenous communities or minority groups, often experience the harsh impacts of the unrestrained use of force by security actors.3 A lack of well-defined roles and responsibilities; poor recruitment, vetting, and training practices; and limited oversight of security providers result in well-documented human rights abuses and so- called ‘security disparities’ which adversely impact communities.4 Therefore, States and business actors, whether as security actors themselves or as clients of security actors, must ensure that security operations comply with international human rights law and international humanitarian law (IHL) where appropriate, as well as any other applicable international legal provisions, throughout the life of a project.

AB - It is well known that security operations, whether public, private, in-house, or public- private hybrids, may give rise to significant human rights issues.1 Consequently, the poorly regulated provision of security for investment projects has long been a source of particular human rights concern.2 This is especially true of large-scale projects involving the exploitation of natural resources, where marginalised groups, such as indigenous communities or minority groups, often experience the harsh impacts of the unrestrained use of force by security actors.3 A lack of well-defined roles and responsibilities; poor recruitment, vetting, and training practices; and limited oversight of security providers result in well-documented human rights abuses and so- called ‘security disparities’ which adversely impact communities.4 Therefore, States and business actors, whether as security actors themselves or as clients of security actors, must ensure that security operations comply with international human rights law and international humanitarian law (IHL) where appropriate, as well as any other applicable international legal provisions, throughout the life of a project.

U2 - 10.2139/ssrn.4338838

DO - 10.2139/ssrn.4338838

M3 - Preprint

SP - 1

EP - 8

BT - Principles for Responsible Contracts PRC 6: Physical Security for the Project

PB - SSRN: Social Science Research Network

ER -

ID: 333817934