Network analysis and comparative migration law: examples from the European Court of Human Rights

Research output: Working paper › Research › peer-review

Standard

Network analysis and comparative migration law: examples from the European Court of Human Rights. / Byrne, William Hamilton; Gammeltoft-Hansen, Thomas; Olsen, Henrik Palmer.

Mobile Working Paper Series, 2023. p. 1-22.

Research output: Working paper › Research › peer-review

Harvard

Byrne, WH, Gammeltoft-Hansen, T & Olsen, HP 2023 'Network analysis and comparative migration law: examples from the European Court of Human Rights' Mobile Working Paper Series, pp. 1-22.

APA

Byrne, W. H., Gammeltoft-Hansen, T., & Olsen, H. P. (2023). Network analysis and comparative migration law: examples from the European Court of Human Rights. (pp. 1-22). Mobile Working Paper Series.

Vancouver

Byrne WH, Gammeltoft-Hansen T, Olsen HP. Network analysis and comparative migration law: examples from the European Court of Human Rights. Mobile Working Paper Series. 2023, p. 1-22.

Author

Byrne, William Hamilton ; Gammeltoft-Hansen, Thomas ; Olsen, Henrik Palmer. / Network analysis and comparative migration law: examples from the European Court of Human Rights. Mobile Working Paper Series, 2023. pp. 1-22

Bibtex

@techreport{6542dd49d3f54353a074b85ddb43e8fc,
title = "Network analysis and comparative migration law: examples from the European Court of Human Rights",
abstract = "International migration law (IML) is famously fragmented, which provides fertile ground for comparative inquiry. However, this task is inhibited the heterodox nature of IML as it draws on a composite body of law that is expressed in different concepts, interpretations and languages. This paper presents network analysis as one useful methodology for navigating IML's normative architecture and empirically mapping case law and its interrelations. Part I introduces network analysis as a data driven method for representing the relationship between variables in a legal network. Part II exemplifies its empirical purchase in the European Court of Human Rights' migration case law. Part III suggests the further added value that arises for a comparative migration law by bringing into scope authoritative judicial practice across wider data sets. Part IV concludes reflexively by asking what unravelling the web of IML might reveal for a field always caught between universalist and relativist theoretical narratives.",
author = "Byrne, {William Hamilton} and Thomas Gammeltoft-Hansen and Olsen, {Henrik Palmer}",
year = "2023",
language = "English",
pages = "1--22",
publisher = "Mobile Working Paper Series",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Mobile Working Paper Series",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - Network analysis and comparative migration law: examples from the European Court of Human Rights

AU - Byrne, William Hamilton

AU - Gammeltoft-Hansen, Thomas

AU - Olsen, Henrik Palmer

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - International migration law (IML) is famously fragmented, which provides fertile ground for comparative inquiry. However, this task is inhibited the heterodox nature of IML as it draws on a composite body of law that is expressed in different concepts, interpretations and languages. This paper presents network analysis as one useful methodology for navigating IML's normative architecture and empirically mapping case law and its interrelations. Part I introduces network analysis as a data driven method for representing the relationship between variables in a legal network. Part II exemplifies its empirical purchase in the European Court of Human Rights' migration case law. Part III suggests the further added value that arises for a comparative migration law by bringing into scope authoritative judicial practice across wider data sets. Part IV concludes reflexively by asking what unravelling the web of IML might reveal for a field always caught between universalist and relativist theoretical narratives.

AB - International migration law (IML) is famously fragmented, which provides fertile ground for comparative inquiry. However, this task is inhibited the heterodox nature of IML as it draws on a composite body of law that is expressed in different concepts, interpretations and languages. This paper presents network analysis as one useful methodology for navigating IML's normative architecture and empirically mapping case law and its interrelations. Part I introduces network analysis as a data driven method for representing the relationship between variables in a legal network. Part II exemplifies its empirical purchase in the European Court of Human Rights' migration case law. Part III suggests the further added value that arises for a comparative migration law by bringing into scope authoritative judicial practice across wider data sets. Part IV concludes reflexively by asking what unravelling the web of IML might reveal for a field always caught between universalist and relativist theoretical narratives.

M3 - Working paper

SP - 1

EP - 22

BT - Network analysis and comparative migration law: examples from the European Court of Human Rights

PB - Mobile Working Paper Series

ER -

ID: 392718075